A Study of Making Dye Sensitized Solar Cell Using MK-II Dye by Electrophoretic Deposition Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Dye Sensitized Solar Cell (DSSC) is more inexpensive and ecofriendly than silicone solar cell from structure. It has been reported that DSSC made by used ruthenium reaches 10.7 % [1]. However there are some contradiction so that a pigment named Ruthenium complex which is toxic is used in it. So we investigated to solve these problems using MK-II dye that is inexpensive and harmless. At the same time, we explored what kind of influence in conversion efficiency from difference of coating thickness by Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD) method. This method can lead to use flexible materials [2]. Because letting to deposit Titanium oxide (TiO2), we can lower sintering temperature or less to plastic melting point. The result was cell’s conversion efficiency better than others in case of 90sec and 100sec of electrophoresis time. From our experiments it is able to be said that coating thickness made by 90sec and 100sec are suitable, and its difference affect conversion efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

407-411

Citation:

Online since:

September 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Takashi Funaki, Hiromi Funakoshi, Osamu Kitao, Nobuko Onozawa-Komatsuzaki, Kazuyuki Kasuga, Kazuhiro Sayama, and Hideki Sugihara. Cyclometalated Ruthenium (II) Complexes as Near-IR Sensitizers for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, p.7528–7531, (2012).

DOI: 10.1002/anie.201108738

Google Scholar

[2] Hsin-Wei Chena, Chia-Yu Lina, Yi-Hsuan Laia, Jian-Ging Chena, Chun-Chieh Wanga, Chih-Wei Hub, Chih-Yu Hsua, R. Vittala, Kuo-Chuan Ho. Electrophoretic deposition of ZnO film and its compression for a plastic based flexible dye-sensitized solar cell. Journal of Power Sources, p.4859–4864, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.057

Google Scholar

[3] Anyi Mei, Xiong Li, Linfeng Liu, Zhiliang Ku, Tongfa Liu, Yaoguang Rong, Mi Xu, Min Hu, Jiangzhao Chen, Ying Yang, Michael Grätzel, Hongwei Han. A hole-conductor–free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science, PP. 295-298, (2014).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1254763

Google Scholar

[4] J. J. Van Tessel & C. A. Randall. Mechanisms of electrophoretic deposition. Key Engineering Materials, 314, pp.167-174, (2006).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.314.167

Google Scholar

[5] R. Kawakami, T. Yuasa, K. Ito, Y. Sato, Y. Mori, M. Adachi & S. Yoshikado. Evaluation of TiO2 nanoparticles thin films prepared by electrophoresis deposition. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 48(2), pp.236-243, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.485.165

Google Scholar

[6] Weiwei Tana, Xiong Yina, Xiaowen Zhoua, Jingbo Zhanga, Xurui Xiaoa, Yuan Lina. Electrophoretic deposition of nanocrystalline TiO2 films on Ti substrates for use in flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta, pp.4467-4472, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.03.037

Google Scholar