Modelling of Tool Engagement and FEM-Simulation of Chip Formation for Drilling Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Drilling is the most used machining operation in modern manufacturing. Consequently, a high efficiency is desired which can achieved by proper tool geometries and process conditions. The claim for a high degree of process understanding is met by the attempt to visualize the chip formation on a micro scale, e.g. by the use of the finite element method. While two-dimensional FE-simulations of cutting processes are established 3D is the next step to take for further analysis of the drilling processes. Nevertheless, this puts high challenges to the simulative approach in order to achieve valid results. This paper deals with the modelling and the simulation of drilling operations with respect to tool and workpiece geometry. In order to create an acceptable starting condition it is useful to consider the engagement situation of the tool and the workpiece as an ideal state with a defined uncut chip thickness in front of the cutting edge. This provides shorter calculation times due to earlier steady-state chip formation compared to simulations with workpieces which are modeled with uniform surfaces like planes or cones in the initial state. Therefore, the engagement situation is created by the utilization of a geometric-kinematical modelling technique in which an array of rays and their intersections with a triangular mesh constitute a discrete description of a surface. The obtained set of points is further used for triangulation to generate the workpiece geometry mesh. Finally, finite element simulations of the drilling processes are carried out and are analyzed with respect to drilling torque and feed force.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

183-188

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Roud, M. Zetek, I. Cesákova, J. Sklenicka, P. Kozmin, Using FEM for Chip Formation and Cutting Force Prediction When Drilling Tool Steel AISI D3. MM (Modern Machinery) Science Journal, March (2011) 236-239.

DOI: 10.17973/mmsj.2011_03_201102

Google Scholar

[2] A.H. Kheireddine, A. H, Ammouri, T. Lu, I.S. Jawahir, R.F. Hamadea, An FEM Analysis with Experimental Validation to Study the Hardness of In-Process Cryogenically Cooled Drilled Holes in Mg AZ31b. Procedia CIRP, 8 (2013) 588-593.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.156

Google Scholar

[3] W. Mieszczak, K. Lis, FEM Temperature Modelling in Drilling Processes. 14th International Research/Expert Conference Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology, Mediterranean Cruise, 11. -18. September (2010).

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Yang, J. Sun, Finite Element Modelling and Simulating of Drilling of Titanium Alloy, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Information and Computing Science, ICIC, 4 (2009) 178-181.

DOI: 10.1109/icic.2009.355

Google Scholar

[5] M. Abouridouane, F. Klocke, D. Lung, O. Adams, A new 3D multiphase FE model for microcutting ferritic–pearlitic carbon steels. CIRP Annals, 61 (2012) 71-74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.075

Google Scholar

[6] M. Abouridouane, F. Klocke, D. Lung, Microstructure-based 3D Finite Element Model for Micro Drilling Carbon Steels. Procedia CIRP, 8 (2013) 94-99.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.071

Google Scholar

[7] V. Schulze, F. Zanger, J. Michna, F. Lang, 3D-FE-Modelling of the Drilling Process – Prediction of Phase Transformations at the Surface Layer. Procedia CIRP, 8 (2013) 33-38.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.061

Google Scholar

[8] D. Biermann, I. Iovkov, Modeling and simulation of heat input in deep-hole drilling with twist drills and MQL, Procedia CIRP, 8 (2013) 88-93.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.070

Google Scholar

[9] P. Kyratsis, N. Bilalis, A. Antoniadis, CAD-based simulations and design of experiments for determining thrust force in drilling operations. Cumputer-Aided Design, 43 (2011) 1879-1890.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2011.06.002

Google Scholar

[10] T. Möller, B. Trumbore, Fast, Minimum Storage Ray-Triangle Intersection, Journal of Graphics Tools. 2/1 (1997) 21-28.

DOI: 10.1080/10867651.1997.10487468

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. blender. org, [02. 05. 2014].

Google Scholar

[12] N.N. Zorev, Inter-relationship between shear processes occurring along tool face and shear plane in metal cutting. International Research in Production Engineering ASME, New York. (1963) 42-49.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Biermann, I. Terwey, M. Wolf, Einfluss der Mikrogestalt auf die mechanische Belastung. WB Werkstatt und Betrieb, 10 (2011) 57-59, Carl Hanser Verlag, München.

Google Scholar