The Study of Characteristic Impedance of Conductive Transmission Line in FPC(Flexible Printed Circuit Board) Design and Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

To meet the demand of the signal stable at high speed, the key is control precision for the characteristic impedance of FPC. This article is intended to study the strip-line structure for reducing cross-talk (noise) and their theoretical analysis and calculation. By varying effect factor and countermeasure in the production process of FPC, and the optimal process parameter have been obtained. By using the some testing technology, the impedance of strip-line in FPC have been tested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1061-1062)

Pages:

1021-1024

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chen Peng Calculation and alysis of Dispersion Characteristic of ACPW Using FDTD Method [J] Acta Electronica Snica, 2006, 34(9): 1610一1612.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Fjelstad. Flexible Circuit Technology(Third Edition)[M]. London: BR Publishing, Inc., 2006: 51-57.

Google Scholar

[3] L. Sanna,S. Kirsi,F. Laura. Changes in water absorption and modules of elasticity of flexible printed circuit board materials in high humidity testing[C]. European Microelectronics and Packing Conference, Brighton, 2011, 1969-(2013).

Google Scholar

[4] L. C. Yong.M. W. Chul J.S. Boo. Surface finishes of rolled copper foil for flexible printed circuit board[J]. Materials science and engineering, 2008, 483(2): 723-726.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.176

Google Scholar

[5] K. Christof,K. Reiner,D. Thmas. Roll to roll manufacturing of electronic devices [C]. 18th International Display Workshops, Nagoya, 2011, 1729-1732.

Google Scholar

[6] H.T. Ma,T.K. Lee. Effects of board design variations on the reliability of lead-free solder joints[J]. Componets Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 3(1): 71-78.

DOI: 10.1109/tcpmt.2012.2223214

Google Scholar