Identification and Epidemic Analysis on NTM of Cattle and Pigs in Jilin Province

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to further study on NTM distribution in livestock of Jilin province and provide basis on NTM prevention. Isolation of NTM and the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the suspected NTM strains were identified from 1050 PPD negative tissues of livestock. In the test, 21 strains NTM were successfully identified. The total isolation rate of NTM was 2.0 %, NTM isolation rates of cattle and pigs were 1.82 % and 2.2 % respectively. Other strains were all identified successfully except 6 samples, in which 3 strains were identified as mycobacterium gilvum, 1 strains as mycobacterium vaccae, 5 strains as mycobacterium neoaurum, 3 strains as mycobacteria fortuitum and 3 strains as mycobacteria intracellular respectively. In order to formulate effective control measures and protect the health of people and animals, attention should be paid to the infection on NTM of livestock in Jilin Province and further study on its toxicity and influence should be carried out.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

367-373

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Falkinham JO, in: Nontuberculous mycobactefia in the environment, volume 5 of C1in Chest Med(2002), p.520-55l.

Google Scholar

[2] Pamela Sonnenberg, Jill Murray and Stuart Shearer, in: Tuberculosis treatment failure and drug resistance same strain or reinfection, volume 94 of Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, chapter 10 (2000), pp.603-607.

DOI: 10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90205-0

Google Scholar

[3] Turenne C, Chedore P and Wolfe J, in: Phenotypic and molecular characterization of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium elephantis from human specimens, volume 40 of J Clin Microbiol, chapter 4(2002), pp.1230-1236.

DOI: 10.1128/jcm.40.4.1230-1236.2002

Google Scholar

[4] William NR, Stuart MG. Tuberculosis. USA: Lippincoot Williams&wilkins, 2004, pp.651-662.

Google Scholar

[5] LI L C, HU Q H, LIU J, et al, in: The research on the etiology of postoperative outbreaks in nosocomial by Mycobacterium chelonei subspabscesses. volume 20 of Bulletin of the Chinese Antituberculosis Association(1998), p.198 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] PENG T, WEN B H, JIAN R, et al, in: The sequence analyses of 16S rRNA genes of mycobacteria. volume 20 of Chinese Journal of Zoonoses, chapter 9(2004), pp.772-776 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Hall L, Doerr KA, Wihlfiel SL, et al, in: Evaluation of the microSeq system for identification of mycobacteria by 16S ribosmal DNA suequencing and its integration into a routine clinical mycobacteriology laboratory, volume 41 of Clin Microbiol(2003).

DOI: 10.1128/jcm.41.4.1447-1453.2003

Google Scholar

[8] CHEN C, XU P, LI J, et al. in: An investigation of the nontuberculous mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems in Shanghai, volume 3 of Journal of Microbes andInfection, chapter 4 (2008), pp.215-218. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] WEN B H. in: Analysis of rickettsial 16S rRNA genes, volume 15 of Chinese Journal of Zoonoses, chapter 6(1999), pp.18-20. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Kirschner P, Kiekenbeck M, Meissner D, et al. in: Genetic heterogeneity within Mycobacterium fortuitum complex species: genotypic criteria for identification, volume 30 of J Clinicrobiol(1991), pp.2772-2775.

DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2772-2775.1992

Google Scholar

[11] Pitulle C, Dorsch M, Kazda J, et al. in: Phylogeny of rapidly growing members of the genus ycobacterium. volume 42 of Int J Syst Bacteriol, chapter 3(1992), pp.337-343.

DOI: 10.1099/00207713-42-3-337

Google Scholar

[12] LIN S P, YANG Y Z, TAN W G, et al. in: Analysis of results in isolation and culture of nontuberculous Mycobacteria in secretions of cattle nasal cavity, volume 5 of China Tropical Medicine, chapter 6(2005), pp.1207-1209. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Ian A Campbell. in: Opportunist mycobacterial infection, volume 32 of Medicine, chapter 2(2004), pp.146-147.

Google Scholar

[14] Jun-Ren Sun, Shih-Yi Lee, Cherng-Lih Perng, et al. in: Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Bactec MGIT 960 Cultures by nhouse IS6110-based PCR Assay in Routine Clinical Practice. volume 108 of Formosan Medical Association(2009).

DOI: 10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60042-5

Google Scholar

[15] ZHANG Y, WANG T F, QIAN A D, et al. in: Isolation and Identification of atypical Mycobacteria from Swine and Cattle. volume 268 of Jilin Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, chapter 7(2010), pp.10-13. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] WANG T F, ZHANG Y, QIAN A D. in: Isolation and identification of Nontuberculous mycobacterium from cattle. volume 47 of Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine, chapter 6(2011), pp.15-17. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] YANG Jian-hua, MA Li-ping. in: Exploration of Treatment and Present Situation of Non-TB Bacillus Infection. volume 25 of Journal of Medical Forum, chapter 7(2004), pp.3-4.

Google Scholar

[18] Lancet. in: Recently recognized mycobacteria of clinical significance. volume 38 of Journal of Infection, chapter 3, (1999), pp.157-161.

Google Scholar

[19] Brown B.A., Springer B., et al. in: Mycobacterium wolinskyi sp. Nov. and Mycobacterium goodii sp. nov., two new rapidly growing species related to Mycobacterium smegmatis and associated with human wound infections: a cooperative study from the International Working Group on Mycobacterial Taxonomy. volume 49 of Syst. Bacteriol(1999).

DOI: 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1493

Google Scholar