Crystallite Cluster Structure Formation Resulting from Semi-Enclosed Cage Interaction in TSI-POSS/PU Hybrid Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Trisilanolisobutyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (TSI-POSS) with three hydroxyl functional groups pendent to a semi-enclosed cage, was incorporated in concentrations of 7, 13 and 22 wt% into 4,4'-methylenebis (phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) and glycerol propoxylate to prepare TSI-POSS/PU hybrid composites as a heavy linking node in backbone, respectively. The domain micro-structures of these composites were investigated by FTIR, wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and molecular dynamics simulation approach. The results indicate that with TSI-POSS concentration increasing in hybrid composites, distinct crystallite clusters are formed which increase the volume of hard segments and lead to the micro-phase separation. Meanwhile, details of chain packing has been evaluated by radial distribution function, which shows that below 13wt% TSI-POSS concentration, the number of contacts between neighboring chains is decreased due to the humping semi-enclosed cage of TSI-POSS units. However, when TSI-POSS concentration is up to 22 wt%, the number of contacts is increased because the formation of crystallite cluster pulls neighboring chains closer to each other and significantly shortens their distance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

19-23

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y.R. Liu, Y.D. Huang and L. Liu: Polymer Degradation and Stability Vol. 91(11)(2006), p.2731.

Google Scholar

[2] B. Montero, R. Bellas, C. Ramírez, M. Rico, R. Bouza: Composites Part B: Engineering Vol. 63(2014), p.67.

Google Scholar

[3] Lei Song, Qingliang He, Yuan Hu, Hao Chen: Polymer Degradation and Stability Vol. 93(3)(2008), P. 627.

Google Scholar

[4] Steffen M. Weidner and Sarah Trimpin: Anal. Chem. Vol. 80 (12)(2008), P. 4349.

Google Scholar

[5] Kun Wu, Lei Song, Yuan Hu, Hongdian Lu et al: Progress in Organic Coatings Vol. 65(4)(2009), P. 490.

Google Scholar

[6] Tudor C. Ionescr, Feng Qi, et al: J. Phys. Chem. B Vol. 110(2006), P. 2502.

Google Scholar

[7] R.K. Bharadwaj, R.J. Berry and B.L.: Polym. Vol. 41(2000), P. 7209.

Google Scholar

[8] Rui Pan, Robert Shanks, et al: Polymer BulletinVol. 71(2014), P. 2453.

Google Scholar

[9] Vinicius Pistor, Daniela de Cnto et al.: Journal of Nanomaterials (2012), doi: 10. 1155/2012/28031.

Google Scholar

[10] Xu H, Kou S-W, Lee JS. Preparations: Macromol. Vol. 35(23)(2002), P. 8788.

Google Scholar

[11] Timothy S. Haddad, Brent D. Viers: J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Vol. 11(2001), P. 155.

Google Scholar