Parametric Optimization in Drilling Operation Using Response Surface Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

Modeling and optimization of machining parameters are the indispensable elements in modern metal cutting processes. The present study realize the interaction of drilling input process parameters such as spindle speed, feed rate and number of holes and their influence on the surface roughness, diameter and position of hole obtained in drilling of mild steel. The contour plots were generated to highlights the interaction of process parameters as well as their effect on responses. An empirical model of surface roughness, diameter and position of hole was developed using response surface methodology (RSM). The model fitted and measured values were quite close, which indicates that the developed models can be effectively used to predict the respective response. The process parameters are optimized using desirability-based approach response surface methodology.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

117-131

Citation:

Online since:

June 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kilickap, E., Huseyinoglu, M., Yardimeden, A., Optimization of drilling parameters on surface roughness in drilling of AISI 1045 using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm, Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Technol. Vol. 52 (2010) pp.79-88.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2710-7

Google Scholar

[2] Iliescu, D., Gehin, D., Gutierrez, M. E., Girot, F., Modeling and tool wear in drilling of CFRP, Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture Vol. 50 (2010) pp.204-214.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.10.004

Google Scholar

[3] Durão, L. M. P., Gonçalves, D.J.S., Tavares, J. M. R.S., V., Albuquerque, V. H.C., Vieira, A. A., and Marques, A.T., Drilling tool geometry evaluation for reinforced composites laminates, J. of Composites Structure Vol. 92 (2010) pp.1545-1550.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.035

Google Scholar

[4] Kilickap, E., and Huseyinoglu, M., Selection of optimum parameters on burr height using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm in drilling of AISI 304 stainless steel, J. of Materials Manuf. Process, Vol. 25 (2010) pp.1068-1076.

DOI: 10.1080/10426911003720854

Google Scholar

[5] Seeman, M., Ganesan, G., Karthikeyan, R., and Velayudham, A., Study on tool wear and surface roughness in machining of particulate aluminum metal matrix composite response surface methodology approach, Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol. 48 (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2297-z

Google Scholar

[6] Çaydaş, U., Hasçalık, A., Buytoz, O., and Meyveci, A., Performance evaluation of different twist drills in dry drilling of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel, J. of Material and Manuf. Process Vol. 26 (2011) pp.951-960.

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2010.520790

Google Scholar

[7] Tosun, G., Statistical analysis of process parameters in drilling of AL/SICp metal matrix composite, Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 55 (2011) pp.477-485.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-3103-7

Google Scholar

[8] Krishanraj, V., Prabukarthi, A., Ramanathan, A., Elanghovan, N., Kumar, M.S., Zitoune, R., and Davim, J.P., Optimization of machining parameter at high speed drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) laminates, J. of Composites, Vol. 43 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.007

Google Scholar

[9] Tansel, I.N., Demetgul, M. Li.M., Bickraj, K., Kaya, B., and Ozcelik, B., Detecting chatter and estimating wear from the torque of end milling signals by using index based reasoned(IBR), Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 58 (2012) pp.109-118.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2838-5

Google Scholar

[10] Mukherjee, I., and Ray, P.K., A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes, J. of Computers and Ind. Eng. Vol. 50 (2006) pp.15-34.

Google Scholar

[11] Rajmohan, T., and Palanikumar, K., Experimental investigation and analysis of thrust force in drilling hybrid metal matrix composites by coated carbide drills, J. of Materials Manuf. Process, Vol. 26 (2011) pp.961-968.

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2010.523915

Google Scholar