Network Security Risk Assessment Method Research Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of complexity and uncertainty factors existing in network security risk assessment process, an analysis method based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process is proposed in this paper. By the theory of fuzzy mathematic, this method establishes the network risk assessment model and constructs fuzzy judgment matrix to determine index weight of each level factor. The example of calculation results shows that the method is feasible and effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 121-122)

Pages:

80-86

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Saaty T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill, (1980).

Google Scholar

[2] Ernest Forman, Decision By Objectives, George Washington University: pp.43-79.

Google Scholar

[3] Li Zhongfeng, He Shunli, Zhou Xiangguang and Men Chengquan, Application of the Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process to Economic Evaluation on Natural Gas Development Technology. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25 (7).

Google Scholar

[4] Si Shubin, Sun Shudong, Han Guangchen and Wang Junqiang, A Weighted Analysis of an Integrated Logistic Support Based on Triangular Fuzzy Number [J], Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2004. 22 (6) , pp.690-691.

Google Scholar

[5] Ren Hong and Qin Jisheng. Investment decision-making and risk assessment of giant project Based on Triangular Fuzzy Number, Statistics and Decision, 2007, 1 (2).

Google Scholar

[6] Hua Yao and Yu Mingchuan, Comprehensive Evaluation of Enterprise Information Service Ability Based on FAHP.

Google Scholar

[7] Liu Yuan and Zhao Youqun, Impact Assessment Model of Vehicle Failure Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, Agricultural equipment and vehicle engineering, 2009, 6 (23).

Google Scholar