Research on Impact Behavior of Reactive Powder Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

By means of the three-point bending impact equipment, with the measurement of ultrasonic velocity, the impact behavior and damage evolution of reactive powder concrete (RPC) with 0, 1%, 2% and 3% volume fraction of steel fiber were tested. The results showed that steel fiber significantly improved the compressive strength, flexural strength, flexural toughness and impact toughness of RPC matrix. The compressive strength, flexural strength, flexural toughness of RPC with 3% steel fiber increased by 40.1%, 102.1%, and 37.4 times than that of plain concrete, respectively, and simultaneously, the impact toughness of RPC with 3% steel fiber was 93.2 times higher than that with 1% steel fiber. RPC with 2% and 3% steel fiber dosage both had relatively high compressive strength, flexural strength and flexural toughness; however, compared with the sample with 2% steel fiber dosage, the impact toughness of RPC with 3% steel fiber dosage increased by more than 10 times. Therefore, taking economy and applicability into consideration, if we mainly emphasis on the compressive strength, flexural strength and flexural toughness, RPC with 2% steel fiber is optimal. While if impact toughness is critical, RPC with 3% steel fiber would be the best choice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 150-151)

Pages:

779-782

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Matte V, Moranville M. Cement Concrete Comp 1999; 21(1): 1-9.

Google Scholar

[2] Allan CLW, Paul AC, Richard B, et al. Cement Concrete Comp 2007; 29(60): 490-7.

Google Scholar

[3] Richard P, Cheyrezy M. ACI SP 1994; 144: 507-18.

Google Scholar

[4] Richard P, Cheyrezy M. Cement Concrete Res 1995; 25(7): 1501-11.

Google Scholar

[5] Aïtcin PC. Cement Concrete Res 2000; 30(9): 1349-59.

Google Scholar

[6] Bonneau O, Vernetb C, Moranvillea M, et al. Cement Concrete Res 2000; 30: 1861-7.

Google Scholar

[7] Shaheen E, Shrive N. ACI Mater J 2006; 103: 444-51.

Google Scholar

[8] Lee MG, Wang YC, Chiu CT. Constr Build Mater 2007; 21(1): 182-9.

Google Scholar

[9] Yazıcı H, Yiğiter H, Karabulut AŞ, et al. Fuel 2008; 87(12): 2401-7.

Google Scholar

[10] Tai YS. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 2009; 52(1): 14-21.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhang YS, Sun W, Liu SF, et al. Cement Concrete Comp 2008; 30(9): 831-8.

Google Scholar

[12] Yazıcı H, Yardımcı MY, Aydın S, et al. Constr Build Mater 2009; 23(3): 1223-31.

Google Scholar

[13] ACI committee 544, ACI Mater J 1988; 85(6): 583-9.

Google Scholar