Competitive Adsorption of Fluoride and Phosphate on MgAl-Co3 Layered Double Hydroxides

Article Preview

Abstract:

Competitive adsorption experiment of fluoride and phosphate on MgAl-CO3 LDHs has been conducted. A series of batch experiments were performed to study the influence of various experimental parameters such as pH, adsorbent dosage and contact time on the adsorption of fluoride and phosphate on MgAl-CO3 LDHs. Three kinetic models have been evaluated in order to attempt to fit the experimental data, namely the pseudo-first order, the pseudo-second order and the Weber and Morris intraparticle diffusion model. The effects of the initial concentration and the addition order of fluoride and phosphate on their adsorption by MgAl-CO3 LDHs were also investigated. The results show that the optimal pH is 4 to 5, adsorbent dosage is 2 g/L and it takes about 2 hours to attain equilibrium. It was found that the pseudo-second order most closely describes the kinetics. The initial concentration and the addition order of fluoride and phosphate influence the adsorption of fluoride to a certain extent, but they have relatively small influence to the adsorption of phosphate on MgAl-CO3 LDHs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 160-162)

Pages:

182-188

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Ayoob and A.K. Gupta: Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 36 (2006), p.433.

Google Scholar

[2] WHO: Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality (World Health Organization, Geneva 1993).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Tanada, M. Kabayama, N. Kawasaki, T. Sakiyama, T. Nakamura, M. Araki and T. Tamura: J. Colloid Interface Sci. Vol. 257 (2003), p.135.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(02)00008-5

Google Scholar

[4] M.G. Sujana, R.S. Thakur, S.N. Das and S.B. Rao: Asian J. Chem. Vol. 4 (1997), p.561.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Cengeloglu, E. Kir and M. Ersoz: Sep. Purif. Technol. Vol. 28(2002), p.81.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Durmaz, H. Kara, Y. Cengeloglu and M. Ersoz: Desalination Vol. 177 (2005), p.51.

Google Scholar

[7] N. Kabay, O. Arar, S. Samatya, U. Yuksel, M. Yuksel: J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 153 (2008), p.107.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Sourirajan and T. Matsurra: Water Res. Vol. 6 (1972), p.1073.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Simons: Desalination Vol. 89 (1993), p.325.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Guo, B.J. Hunt and P.H. Santsci: Water Res. Vol. 35(2001), p.1500.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Pastor, D. Mangin, R. Barat and A. Seco: Bioresource Technol. Vol. 99 (2008), p.6285.

Google Scholar

[12] K. Kuzawa, Y.J. Jung, Y. Kiso, T. Yamada, M. Nagai and T.G. Lee: Chemosphere Vol. 62 (2006), p.45.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Kwon, G.A. Tsigdinos and T.J. Pinnavaia: J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol. 110 (1988), p.3653.

Google Scholar

[14] L. Lv, J. He, M. Wei, D.G. Evans and Z.L. Zhou: Water Res. Vol. 41 (2007), p.1534.

Google Scholar

[15] F. Cavani, F. Trifiro and A. Vaccari: Catal. Today Vol. 11 (1991), p.173.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Lagergren: Handl. Vol. 24 (1898), p.1.

Google Scholar

[17] Y.S. Ho and G. McKay: Process Biochem. Vol. 34 (1999), p.451.

Google Scholar

[18] W.J. Weber Jr. and J.C. Morris: J. Sanit. Eng. Div. Proceed. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. Vol. 89 (1963), p.31.

Google Scholar