Effect of Additives on Characteristics of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) Microspheres

Article Preview

Abstract:

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) based microspheres were prepared via double emulsion solvent evaporation using polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV), polylactide (PLA), poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) or chitosan (CTS) as the additive of wall polymers. It was found that additives had distinct effect on the properties of microspheres, such as the yield, drug loading, average diameter, crystallization states microstructure and surface morphological characters. PHB based microspheres using PEG as the additive had the lowest yield, the smallest average diameter, and the highest drug loading which reached 12.2% thereinto. At the same time it had the lowest crystallinity of PHB, and the diameter of the crystal particles was only 11.44 nm. It was feasible to prepare PHB based microspheres using PEG and PHBV as additives, which had relatively high protein loading but different microstructures and surface morphologies, and they were anticipated to have a good effect of controlled release.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 160-162)

Pages:

54-59

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Sinha, V.R., Trehan, A. J. Control. Release. Vol. 90 (2003), p.261.

Google Scholar

[2] Jeffery, H., Davis, S.S., & O'Hagan, D.T. Int J Pharm. Vol. 77 (1991), p.169.

Google Scholar

[3] Jeffery, H., Davis, S.S., & O'Hagan, D.T. Pharmacy Research. Vol. 10 (1993), p.362.

Google Scholar

[4] Metha, R.C., Thanoo, B.C., & Deluca, P.P. J. Control. Release. Vol. 41 (1996), p.249.

Google Scholar

[5] Meng, F.T., Ma, G.H., Liu, Y.D., et al. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. Vol. 33 (2004), p.177.

Google Scholar

[6] Narayani, R., Rao, K.P. Int J Pharm. Vol. 143 (1996), p.255.

Google Scholar

[7] Avgoustakis, K., Beletsi, A., Panagi, Z., et al. J. Control. Release. Vol. 79 (2002), p.123.

Google Scholar

[8] Carino, G.P., Jacob, J.S., Mathiowitz, E. J. Control. Release. Vol. 65 (2000), p.261.

Google Scholar

[9] Freier T, Kunze C, Nischan C, et al. Biomaterials, Vol. 23 (2002), p.2649.

Google Scholar

[10] Nebe NB, Forster C, Pommerenke H, et al. Biomaterials, Vol. 22 (2001), p.2425.

Google Scholar

[11] Reusch R.N., Sparrow A.W., Gardiner J. Biophys. Acta, Vol. 1123 (1992), p.33.

Google Scholar

[12] Miller N, Williams D. Biomaterials, Vol. 8 (1987), p.129.

Google Scholar

[13] Lee SY. Biotechnol Bioeng. Vol. 49 (1996), p.1.

Google Scholar

[14] Gogolewski, S., Jovanovic, M., Perren, S.M., et al. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 27(1993), p.1135.

Google Scholar

[15] Kalangos A, Faidutti B. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Vol. 112 (1996), p.1401.

Google Scholar

[16] Bergmann, A., Owen, A. J. Polym. Int. Vol. 52 (2003), p.1145.

Google Scholar

[17] Arshady, R. J. Control. Release. Vol. 17 (1991), p.1.

Google Scholar