The Different Probabilistic Method for the Conservatism Analysis of Composite Structure Damage Tolerance Design

Tian Chun Zou; Zhen Yu Feng; Hao Lei Mou; Ke Yi Mao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.194-196.1672

Paper Titles

Preparation and Characterisation of Sulfonic Acid-Functionalized Carbon/Loess Composite
p.1652

Study on the Orientation Angle of the Yarns in 3D Integrated Cellular Woven Structure
p.1656

Antibacterial Property of Chinese fir/TiO₂ Composite
p.1663

Characterisation of Ti-Al and Ti-Cu Laminated Composite Electrode Materials
p.1667

The Different Probabilistic Method for the Conservatism Analysis of Composite Structure Damage Tolerance Design
p.1672

One-Step Synthesis of ZnS Nanocrystals with Graphite Sheaths from a Single-Source Precursor
p.1676

Thermal Properties of the Aluminum Particle Reinforced Silicone Rubber Composites
p.1680

The Addition of Acid Treated Carbon Nanotube on the Tribological Properties of Carbon Fiber Reinforced UHMWPE Composite
p.1685

Investigation of Microstructure and Property of the Fe₃Al/Al₂O₃ Composites Fabricated by Mechanical Alloying Process and Plasma Active Sintering Process
p.1689

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 194-196The Different Probabilistic Method for the...

The Different Probabilistic Method for the Conservatism Analysis of Composite Structure Damage Tolerance Design

Abstract:

The result shows: If probabilistic methods were used to conduct compliance analysis for composite structure damage tolerance. When the impact energy is low, calculated result should conservatively use probabilistic methods of Weibull distribution fitting; when the impact energy is high, calculated result should conservatively use probabilistic methods of logarithmic linear fitting.