Hybrid Dynamic Principal Conponent Analysis Approach for Fault Detection in Steel Rolling Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

In traditional dynamic principal component analysis (DPCA) for fault detection, there are some drawbacks such as an excess of the number of principal components (PCs), low computational efficiency, etc. For dealing with the problem, this paper develops a hybrid dynamic principal component analysis (HDPCA) technique, this method can remove spacial and serial correlation by divide-and-conquer algorithm instead of parallel processing strategy, which can detect individual fault accurately and efficiently. The strip breaking fault in steel rolling process is used to demonstrate the improved performance of developed technique in comparison with traditional DPCA fault detection methods. It can be perceived that HDPCA algorithm has the better performance of fault detection and computational efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 219-220)

Pages:

1574-1577

Citation:

Online since:

March 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.H. Chiang, E.L. Russell, and R.D. Braatz, Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems. (2001), Springer-Verlag London Limited.

Google Scholar

[2] B.Moore, Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on 26 (2002):17-32.

DOI: 10.1109/tac.1981.1102568

Google Scholar

[3] M.K. Hartnett, G. Lightbody, and G.W. Irwin, Identification of state models using principal components analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 46 (1999): 181-196.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7439(98)00184-1

Google Scholar

[4] Q.H. He, X.Y. He, and J.X. Zhu, Fault detection of excavator's hydraulic system based on dynamic principal component analysis. JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 15 (2008): 700-705.

DOI: 10.1007/s11771-008-0130-8

Google Scholar

[5] W.F. Ku, R.H. Storer, and C. Georgakis, Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS 30 (1995): 179-196.

DOI: 10.1016/0169-7439(95)00076-3

Google Scholar

[6] W.E. Larimore. System identification,reduced-order filtering and modeling via canonical variate analysis. In Proc. of the American Control Conf, Piscataway, New Iersey.TEEE Press(1983),pages 445-451.

DOI: 10.23919/acc.1983.4788156

Google Scholar

[7] Y.W. Zhang, H. Zhou, S.J. Qin, and T.Y. Chai, Decentralized Fault Diagnosis of Large-Scale Processes Using Multiblock Kernel Partial Least Squares. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS 6 (2010): 3-10.

DOI: 10.1109/tii.2009.2033181

Google Scholar