The Study of the Correlation between Ground Motion Input and Artificial Boundary Condition

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is documented that some confusions about ground motion input and artificial boundary condition in present seismic analysis affect engineering anti-seismic security evaluation, and that different treatment effects on security are so lack of verification that they are must be checked, discussed and made clear to get consensus. A study was conducted with a typical example with large FEM software ANSYS and comparison was made between the results of various ground motion input and boundary treatment methods and those of theoretical correct analysis. Study shows that ground motion input and artificial boundary condition is greatly correlative and that correct results can’t be got unless ground motion input and artificial boundary condition can be treated and matched properly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

3787-3794

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] CHEN Hou-qun: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 37(2006), pp.1417-1423(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] LIU Jing-bo, WANG Zhen-yu, DU Xiu-li, DU Yi-xin: Engineering Mechanics, Vol. (2005), pp.4-5(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Jingbo, Li Bin: Science in China, Ser. E, Vol. 35(2005), pp.966-980(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Wang Zhenyu; Liu Jingbo: Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 23(2004), pp.1169-1173(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Zhao Mi: STUDY ON THE VISCOUS-SPRING BOUNDARY AND THE TRANSMITTING BOUNDARY [D]. (Beijing University of Technology, China 2004) (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] Li Peizhen; Li Xilin: Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 24(2004), pp.130-138(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] Tao Mingxin: Study of Soil-substructure Dynamic Interaction with FEM [D]. (Northwestern Polytechnical University, China 2004) (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Liu Pujun: Seismic Study of soil-rockfill-dam Dynamic Interaction [D]. (Chongqing Jiaotong University, China 2003) (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] Lei Wenjun; Wei Demin: Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. (2005), pp.110-114(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] YANG De qing; WANG De yu; WANG Xiang bao: Journal of Astronautics, Vol. 24(2003), pp.213-216(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] WANG Yi-gong; YANG You-fa: Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 24(2004), pp.42-45(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[12] Zhang Dongyin: The Application of LS-DYNA in Soil-structure Interaction [D]. (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Seismological Bureau, China 2004) (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] Lysmer, J. and R. L. Kulemeyer: J. Engng. Mech. Div. ASCE, Vol. 95(1969), pp.759-877

Google Scholar

[14] Deeks, A. J. and M. F. Randolph: Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 120(1994), pp.25-42

Google Scholar

[15] Wang Songtao, Cao Zi: Modern Seismic Design Methods (China Architecture and Building Press, China 1997) (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[16] Liu Jingbo, Lu Yandong in: A direct method for analysis of dynamic soil-structure interaction based on interface idea, edited by Zhang Chuhan, Wolf J P, Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction. Academic Press (1997)

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1250(98)80018-7

Google Scholar