An Equivalent Far-Field Dynamic-Artificial-Boundary Condition and its Accuracy Studies

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to eliminate some problems of ordinary artificial boundary conditions in soil-structure dynamic interaction analysis at present, such as plenty amount of work required in establishing viscous boundary and viscous-elastic boundary and the expensive computing hours cost in traditional far-field artificial boundary condition, an equivalent far-field artificial boundary condition for dynamic analysis was proposed based on the wave propagating theory and the reflection and transmission principle of wave on the interface of medium by setting a fully-transmitting layer and lower the speed of wave considerably propagating within it. Then numerical simulations and studies of factors affecting accuracy for equivalent far-field artificial boundary condition were conducted with FEM. Researches show that equivalent far-field artificial boundary is as nearly accurate as viscous boundary; it can overcome the problems of viscous boundary, viscous-elastic boundary and traditional far-field boundary mentioned above; it is very convenient to operate and realize; it is very efficient and low-cost in workforce. The equivalent far-field boundary proposed can be applied to engineering dynamic field such as anti-seismic of structures, vibration and impact etc.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

3795-3803

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] John P. Wolf: Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction (Prentice-Hall, INC., New Jersey 1985)

Google Scholar

[2] D. Koyama in: An Artificial Boundary Condition for the Numerical Computation of Scattering Waves, edited by DDM.org, 12th International Conference on Domain Decomposition Methods, DDM.org(2001).

Google Scholar

[3] Lysmer J, R L Kulemeyer: J. Engng. Mech. Div. ASCE, Vol. 95 (1969), pp.859-877

Google Scholar

[4] LYSM ER J, KUH LEMEYER R L: J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE, Vol. 99 (1973), pp.421-427

Google Scholar

[5] JIAO Y Y, ZHANG X L, ZH AO J, et al: Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 44 (2007), pp.1070-1076

Google Scholar

[6] Deeks A J, Randolph M F: Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 120 (1994), pp.25-42

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Q, Guo B Z: Journal of optimization Theory and Applications,Vol. 122 (2004),pp.669-690

Google Scholar

[8] Olivier Chiello, Franck C. Sgard, and Noureddine Atalla: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. (1999), p.105, 1087

Google Scholar

[9] Alteman Z. S. and F. C. Jr. Karal: Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol. 58 (1968), pp.367-398

Google Scholar

[10] Liu Jingbo, Lu Yandong in: A direct method for analysis of dynamic soil-structure interaction based on interface idea, edited by Zhang Chuhan, Wolf J P, Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction. Academic Press (1997).

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1250(98)80018-7

Google Scholar

[11] Deeks A J, Randolph M F: Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 120 (1994), p.25~42

Google Scholar

[12] Liao Zhenpeng: Introduction to wave motion theories in engineering (Second edition) (Science Press, China 2002 (in Chinese))

Google Scholar