Mechanical Properties and Decay Resistance of Wood Polymer Composites (WPC)

Article Preview

Abstract:

In Malaysia, especially Borneo Island Sarawak has a large scale of tropical wood species. In this study, selected raw tropical wood species namely Artocarpus Elasticus, Artocarpus Rigidus, Xylopia Spp, Koompassia Malaccensis and Eugenia Spp were chemically treated with sodium meta periodate to convert them into wood polymer composites. Manufactured wood polymer composites were characterized using mechanical testing (modulus of elasticity (MOE), modulus of rupture (MOR), static Young’s modulus) and decay resistance test. Modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture were calculated using three point bending test. Static Young’s modulus and decay resistance were calculated using compression parallel to gain test and natural laboratory decay test respectively. The manufactured wood polymer composites yielded higher modulus of elasticity, modulus of rupture and static Young’s modulus. Wood polymer composite had high resistant to decay exposure, while Eugenia Spp wood polymer composite had highly resistant compared to the other ones.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 264-265)

Pages:

819-824

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Oksman, M. Skrifvars and J.F. Selin: Com. Sci. and Tech. 63 (2003), pp.1317-1324.

Google Scholar

[2] S. S. Kim, H. N. Yu, I.U. Hwang, D.G. Lee: Comp. Structures. 86 (2008) pp.279-284.

Google Scholar

[3] B.J. Lee, and A.G. McDonald : Proceeding of 5th pacific Rim Biobased Com. Sump. (2000) pp.664-670.

Google Scholar

[4] J.A. Youngquist: Forest Product Journal. 45 (1995) pp.25-30.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Bodig and B. A. Jayne: Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composite, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, USA, (1982).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Ono and M. Norimoto: Acta. Rheo. Acta. 23 (1984) pp.652-656.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Llic: Hols. als. Roh. Wekkstoff. 59 (2001) pp.169-175.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Divos and T. Tanaka: Acta Silv. Lign. Hung. 1 (2005) pp.105-110.

Google Scholar

[9] R. E. Wetton and P. J. Corish: Poly. Test. 8(5)(1989) pp.303-312.

Google Scholar

[10] R. E. Wettton, R. D. L. Mars and J. G. Van-de-Velde: Acta Thermo. 175 (1991) pp.1-11.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Sadoh: Mokuzai Gakkaish. 18(11) (1972) pp.543-548.

Google Scholar

[12] American Socity for Testing and Materials. (1996)ASTM D-143.

Google Scholar

[13] American Socity for Testing and Materials. 2001ASTM D 2017., Vol. 4. 10 Wood pp.322-326.

Google Scholar

[14] C. Umit. Yildiz, Sibel Yildiz, D . Engin. Gezer: Bioresource Technology 96(2005) pp.1003-1011.

Google Scholar

[15] D. G . Adams, E.T. Choong, R. C Mcllhenny. Forest Prod.J. 20(4) (1970) pp.25-28.

Google Scholar

[16] M.K. Yalinkilic, K. Tsunoda, M. Takahashi, E. D Gezer, W. Dwianto, H. Nemoto, Holzforshung : 52 (6) (1998) pp.667-672.

DOI: 10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.6.667

Google Scholar