An Available-to-Promise System for Network-Manufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

This Paper Presents Development of an Available-to-Promise (ATP) System for Network-Manufacturing in a Global Environment where Multi-Plants Are Manufacturing Products Collaboratively and Are Globally Networked. within the Multi-Plant Mode, the ATP Process Is Challenged to Give Not only Quick Response but Also Precise Order Promising by Considering the Coordination of Production Planning and Scheduling among Plants. in this Paper, an Order Decision and Production Planning Integrated ATP Model Was Developed and a Series of Performance Analysis Experiment Was Conducted to Reveal the Impact of some Key Factors such as Planning Horizon, Batch Interval Etc. on Overall Profit.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 268-270)

Pages:

303-308

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhao, Z., M. Ball, et al. Optimization-Based Available-to-Promise and Multi-Stage Resource Availability., Annals of operational research, 135, 2005, pp.65-85.

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-005-6235-7

Google Scholar

[2] Kaminsky, P. and O. Kaya. Inventory positioning, scheduling and lead-time quotation in supply chains., International Journal of Production Economics, 114(1), 2008, pp.276-293.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.006

Google Scholar

[3] Lee, Y. M. Simulating impact of available to promise generation on supply chain performance., Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference, 2006, pp.621-626.

DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2006.323138

Google Scholar

[4] CHEN Chien-Yu, ZHAO Zhenying, BALL M. O. A model for batch advanced available-to-promise[J]. Production & Operation Manage, 2002, 11(4): 424-440.

Google Scholar

[5] Pibernik R. Advanced available-to-promise: Classification, selected methods and requirements for operations and inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 93: 239-252.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.06.023

Google Scholar