Evaluating Head Mounted Display Efficiency by User Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

Head Mounted Display (HMD) has been widely used in the area of wearable computing, augmented/virtual reality etc. The different image sources and optical subsystems of HMDs result in the diverse comprehensive display properties and optical properties. The traditional method to evaluate a HMD is modular transfer function. It requires special instruments, software and professional backgrounds knowledge, and thus leads to the lack of usability when it applied by common users. On the basis of human transfer function and Fitts’ model, in this paper we proposed an evaluation method, which has the advantage of easy applying. We evaluated this method targeting at a commercial HMD and a custom HMD, and the result shows that our method has a high usability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 268-270)

Pages:

523-527

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Havig, S. Grigsby, E. Heft, J. Lacreta, and D. Post, Luminance contrast and color recognition in helmet-mounted displays, in SPIE proceedings series, 2001, p.198–204.

DOI: 10.1117/12.437995

Google Scholar

[2] E. Peli, Optometric and perceptual issues with head-mounted displays. McGrawHill, New York, p.205–276, (1999).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Adams, H. Bergeron, U. S. N. Aeronautics, S. Administration, and L. R. Center, Measurements of Human Transfer Function with Various Model Forms. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, (1964).

Google Scholar

[4] M. McGuffin and R. Balakrishnan, Fitts' law and expanding targets: Experimental studies and designs for user interfaces, ACM T Comput-Hum Int, vol. 12, no. 4, p.422–445, (2005).

DOI: 10.1145/1121112.1121115

Google Scholar

[5] P. Fitts, The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement., J Exp Psychol, vol. 47, no. 6, p.381–391, (1954).

DOI: 10.1037/h0055392

Google Scholar

[6] R. Soukoreff and I. MacKenzie, Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of fitts' law research in hci, Int J Hum Comput Stud, vol. 61, p.751–789, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001

Google Scholar

[7] S. Zhai, Characterizing computer input with fitts' law parameters–the information and non-information aspects of pointing, Int J Hum Comput Stud, vol. 61, no. 6, p.791–809, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.006

Google Scholar

[8] M. Oehl, C. Sutter, and M. Ziefle, Considerations on efficient touch interfaces–how display size influences the performance in an applied pointing task, in Human Interface and the Management of Information. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, p.136.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73345-4_17

Google Scholar

[9] J. Coull, P. Weir, L. Tremblay, D. Weeks, and D. Elliott, Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement, J Mot Behav, vol. 32, no. 4, p.347–360, (2000).

DOI: 10.1080/00222890009601385

Google Scholar

[10] R. Laramee and C. Ware, Rivalry and interference with a head-mounted display, ACM T Comput-Hum Int, vol. 9, no. 3, p.238–251, (2002).

DOI: 10.1145/568513.568516

Google Scholar

[11] R. Dean andW. Dixon, Simplified statistics for small numbers of observations, Anal Chem, vol. 23, no. 4, p.636–638, (1951).

DOI: 10.1021/ac60052a025

Google Scholar