Effects of Dimethylhydantoin and Carbohydrate on Growth and Immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three experiments were conducted to study the effects of dimethylhydantoin (DBH) and carbohydrate on growth and immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei under low salinity conditions. Experiment 1 examined the effect of DBH on the survival of L. vannamei. The results showed that with increasing DBH concentration, the survival rate of L. vannamei exhibited decreased trends at salinities of 0.2, 5 and 20, while the safety concentration of DBH to L. vannamei increased with the rise of salinity. Experiment 2 and 3 examined the effects of salinity, DBH and carbohydrate on growth and immunity of L. vannamei, the results show that under low salinity culture conditions, the long-term living in the DBH environment of L. vannamei could lead to stresses, the shrimps needed to consume more immune factors, so the activities of phenoloxidase and superoxide dismutase in serum decreased, and the growth rates depressed, while the increase in the amount of carbohydrate in diets could not only promote the growth of shrimps, but also played a role in diet protein conservation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

146-151

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. Xu, R. Xu, Z. Zhou and T. Hu: Fisheries Science. Vol. 24 (2005), p.29

Google Scholar

[2] X. Wang, M. Cao, B. Yan, S. Ma and S. Dong: Marine Environmental Science. Vol. 26 (2007), p.154

Google Scholar

[3] S. Ye, Z. Yu: Fisheries Science. Vol. 26 (2007), p.564

Google Scholar

[4] X. Jiang, Y. Li, J. Guo and Y. Ha: Chinese Journal of Disinfection. Vol. 22 (2005), p.422

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Huang. South China Agricultural University, a master's degree thesis (2005)

Google Scholar

[6] C. Pascual, L. Arena and G. Cuzon: Aquaculture. Vol. 230 (2004), p.405

Google Scholar

[7] J. Ye, X. Wang, S. Ma and B. Yan: Marine Fisheries Research. Vol. 29 (2008), p.38

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Liu, G. Cao, S. Jiang, L. Lu and S. Han: Journal of Fisheries of China. Vol. 28 (2004), p.499

Google Scholar

[9] M. Luciane and L. M. Perazzolo: Aquaculture. Vol. 214 (2002), p.19

Google Scholar

[10] C. Rosas, G. Cuzon and G. Gaxiola: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. Vol. 268 (2002), p.47

Google Scholar

[11] E. C. Li, L. Q. Chen and C. Zeng: Aquaculture. Vol. 265 (2007), p.385

Google Scholar

[12] L. U. Wang and J. C. Chen: Fish & Shellfish Immunology. Vol. 18 (2005), p.269

Google Scholar

[13] F. I. Wang and J. C. Chen: Fish & Shellfish Immunology. Vol. 20 (2006), p.671

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Liu, W. N. Wang and A. L. Wang: Aquaculture. Vol. 265 (2007), p.351

Google Scholar

[15] E. C. Li, L. Q. Chen and C. Zeng: Aquaculture. Vol. 274 (2008), p.80

Google Scholar

[16] X. Q. Wang, S. Ma and S. L. Dong: Journal of Shellfish Research. Vol. 23 (2004), p.231

Google Scholar

[17] K. Huang, W. Wang and J. Lu: Journal of Fishery Sciences of China. Vol. 10 (2003), p.318

Google Scholar