Comparison of Mechanical Properties between Thai Orthodontic Elastics with Different Ammonia Contents and Commercial Orthodontic Elastics

Abstract:

Introduction: The most widely used preservative system for natural rubber latex to date is the ammonia-based system preventing spontaneous coagulation and putrefaction due mainly to bacteria contamination. Objectives: The study compared 2 types of Thai orthodontic elastics, produced from natural rubber latex with different ammonia contents with commercial orthodontic elastics in terms of initial extension force, residual force, force loss, swelling index, breaking strength and maximum displacement. Materials and Methods: Thai orthodontic elastics were developed from 2 types of natural rubber latex; low ammonia < 0.15% (Thai-L), and high ammonia not < 0.6% (Thai-H). The mechanical properties of Thai orthodontic elastics were compared with commercial elastics (Ormco). Mechanical properties were tested using a universal testing machine (Instron 5566). Data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test compared the measurements among groups. Results: Ormco had the highest initial extension force and showed significant differences with Thai-L and Thai-H. Thai-L had the highest residual force but showed no significant difference compared with Ormco. Thai-L had the lowest percent of force loss and showed significant differences with Thai-H and Ormco. Thai-L had lower force loss than Thai-H. For swelling index, Thai-L had the highest elasticity. For breaking strength and maximum displacement, both Thai elastics met the Australian Standard (AS) for breaking strength and maximum displacement, similar to Ormco elastics. Conclusion: All elastics met the specifications of the AS for breaking strength and maximum displacement. Thai-L had comparable properties with commercial orthodontic elastics in terms of mechanical properties. Thai-L had comparable properties with Ormco in terms of mechanical properties and may be developed for orthodontic purposes.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 378-379)
• Pages: 580-584
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.378-379.580
• Online since: October 2011
• Authors: N. Anuwongnukroh, Porntiwa Senarak, Surachai Dechkunakorn, Theeralaksna Suddhasthira, C. Kongkaew, Surapich Loykulnant, Wassana Wichai, Sopita Jitboon
• Keywords: Mechanical Property, Natural Rubber Latex (NRL), Orthodontic Elastic

References

[1] Luis, P.L. And A.B. Ronald, Adverse Hypersensitivity Reactions In Orthodontics Semin Orthod, 2004(10): P. 240-243.

[2] Spina, A.M. And H.J. Levine, Latex Allergy: A Review For The Dental Professional. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1999. 87(1): P. 5-11.

DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70286-6

[3] Institution, B.S., International Organization For Standarddization, In Dentistry-Elastomeric Auxiliaries For Use In Orthodontics. ISO 21606. 2007.

[4] K. K. Sasidharan, R.J., Shiny Palaty, K. S. Gopalakrishnan, G. Rajammal, P. Viswanatha Pillai, Effect Of The Vulcanization Time And Storage On The Stability And Physical Properties Of Sulfur-Prevulcanized Natural Rubber Latex". J Appl Polym Sci 2005. 97: P. 1804–1811.

DOI: 10.1002/app.21918

[5] Blackley, D.C., Polymer Latices, Ed. C. Hall. Vol. 2. 1997, London. 485.

[6] Kanchana, P. And K. Godfrey,Calibration Of Force Extension And Force Degradation Characteristics Of Orthodontic Latex Elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000. 118(3): P. 280-7.

DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.104493

[7] Bales, T.R., S.J. Chaconas, And A.A. Caputo, Force-Extension Characteristics Of Orthodontic Elastics. Am J Orthod, 1977. 72(3): P. 296-302.

DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90215-9

[8] Shashanka.P.Kumar A , D.M.R.B., Amarnath B.C.C, Dharmad, Dr Prashanth C.S.E, Akshai Shetty K.Rf., The Evaluation And Comparison Of Force Degradation Of Latex And Non-Latex Intraoral Elastic In A Simulated Oral Environment And In-Vitro Study. The Orthodontic Cyberjournal, 2010.

[9] Andreasen, G.F. And S. Bishara, Comparison Of Alastik Chains Of Elastics Involved With Intra-Arch Molar-To-Molar Forces. Am J Orthod, 1971. 60(2): P. 200-1.

DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90038-8

[10] Kersey, M.L., Et Al., A Comparison Of Dynamic And Static Testing Of Latex And Nonlatex Orthodontic Elastics. Angle Orthod, 2003. 73(2): P. 181-6.

[11] Gioka, C., Et Al., Orthodontic Latex Elastics: A Force Relaxation Study. Angle Orthod, 2006. 76(3): P. 475-9.

[12] Bell, W.R., A Study Of Applied Force As Related To The Use Of Elastics And Coil Springs. Angle Orthod, 1951. 21(3): P. 151-4.

[13] Russell, K.A., Et Al., In Vitro Assessment Of The Mechanical Properties Of Latex And Non-Latex Orthodontic Elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001. 120(1): P. 36-44.

DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.114642

[14] Australia, S.A.O., Australian Standard Specification, In Orthodontic Latex Elastic Bands, AS 1240. 1973.