Carbon Distribution and the Influence on the Tempering Behaviour in a Hot-Work Tool Steel Aisi H11

Article Preview

Abstract:

The microstructure of the common hot-work tool steel AISI H11 has been characterized by atom probe tomography with the focus on the carbon distribution after the hardening treatment and in the early stages of tempering. The carbon distribution shows significant differences within the probed volumes, regions differently affected by carbon segregation can be observed in some specimens. In all samples pronounced carbon segregation to dislocations and cluster formation is observed. Through all hardened samples no segregation of any substitutional elements has taken place. Heating to 500°C does not significantly change the elemental distribution. Carbon enriched interlath austenite films with peak carbon levels of 6 to 9 at% show a thickness increase with increasing λ. These films and the pre-existing carbon clusters have been found to be nucleation sites for carbide formation during heating to 610°C.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

702-706

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Roberts GA, Krauss G, Kennedy R. Tool steels. ASM International (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] Porter DA, Easterling KE. Phase transformations in metals and alloys. Chapman & Hall (1992).

Google Scholar

[3] Caballero FG, Miller MK, Babu SS, Garcia-Mateo C. Acta Materialia 55 (2007) 381.

Google Scholar

[4] Sherman DH, Cross SM, Kim S, Grandjean F, Long GJ, Miller MK. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 38 (2007) 1698.

Google Scholar

[5] Horn RM, Ritchie RO. Metallurgical Transactions A 9 (1978) 1039.

Google Scholar

[6] Caballero FG, Miller MK, Garcia-Mateo C. Acta Materialia 58 2338.

Google Scholar

[7] Thomson RC, Miller MK. Acta Materialia 46 (1998) 2203.

Google Scholar

[8] Wilde J, Cerezo A, Smith GDW. Scripta Materialia 43 (2000) 39.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhu C, Cerezo A, Smith GDW. Ultramicroscopy 109 (2009) 545.

Google Scholar

[10] Clarke AJ, Speer JG, Miller MK, Hackenberg RE, Edmonds DV, Matlock DK, Rizzo FC, Clarke KD, De Moor E. Acta Materialia 56 (2008) 16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.051

Google Scholar

[11] Delagnes D, Lamesle P, Mathon MH, Mebarki N, Levaillant C. Materials Science and Engineering A 394 (2005) 435.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.11.050

Google Scholar

[12] Mebarki N, Delagnes D, Lamesle P, Delmas F, Levaillant C. Materials Science and Engineering A 387-389 (2004) 171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.073

Google Scholar

[13] Miller MK. Atom probe field ion microscopy. Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press (1996).

Google Scholar

[14] Moody MP, Stephenson LT, Ceguerra AV, Ringer SP. Microscopy Research and Technique 71 (2008) 542.

Google Scholar

[15] Mayer S. Einfluss einer bainitischen/martensitischen Mikrostruktur auf die mechanischen Eigenschaften von Warmarbeitsstählen. Department of physical metallurgy and materials testing. Leoben: University of Leoben (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s00501-010-0578-3

Google Scholar