Pareto-Optimal Solutions for a Truss Problem

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most optimization problems, particularly those in engineering design, require the simultaneous optimization of more than one objective function. In this context, the solutions of these problems are based on the Pareto frontier construction. Substantial efforts have been made in recent years to develop methods for the construction of Pareto frontiers that guarantee uniform distribution and exclude the non-Pareto and local Pareto points. The Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI) is a recent contribution that generates a well-distributed Pareto frontier efficiently. Nevertheless, this method should be combined with a global optimization method to ensure the convergence to the global Pareto frontier. This paper proposes the NBI method using Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA) algorithm, namely NBI-ASA as a global nonlinear multi-objective optimization method. A well known benchmark multi-objective problem has been chosen from the literature to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method, applicability of the method for structural problems has been tested through a truss problem and promising results were obtained. The results indicate that the proposed method is a powerful search and multi-objective optimization technique that may yield better solutions to engineering problems than those obtained using current algorithms.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

53-64

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Ait Brik: Méthodologies de conception robuste et d'optimisation dans un contexte de conception d'architectures mécaniques nouvelles en avant projet, Thesis, University of Franche-Comt, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Censor: Pareto Optimality in Multiobjective Problems, Applied Mathematics and Optimization Vol. 4 (1978), pp.41-59.

Google Scholar

[3] I. Das, J. Dennis: A Closer Look at Drawbacks of Minimizing Weighted Sums of Objectives for Pareto Set Generation in Multicriteria Optimization Problem, Structural Optimization Vol. 19 (1997), pp.63-69.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01197559

Google Scholar

[4] I. Das, J. E. Dennis: Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multi-criteria optimization problems, SIAM J. Optim Vol. 8 (1998), pp.631-657.

DOI: 10.1137/s1052623496307510

Google Scholar

[5] W. El Alem, A. El Hami and R. Ellaia: Structural Shape Optimization using an Adaptive Simulated Annealing, Key Engineering Materials Vol. 446 (2010), pp.101-110.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.446.101

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Y. Haimes: Integrated system identification and optimization, Control and Dynamic Systems: Advances in Theory and Applications Vol. 10 (1973), pp.435-453.

Google Scholar

[7] P.W. Jansen, R.E. Perez: Constrained structural design optimization via a parallel augmented Lagrangian particle swarm optimization approach, Computers and structures Vol. 89 (2011), pp.1352-1366.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.03.011

Google Scholar

[8] K. S. Lee, Z. W. Geem: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg Vol. 194 (2005), pp.3902-3933.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.007

Google Scholar

[9] G. Luh, C. Chueh: Multi-objective optimal design of truss structure with immune algorithm, Computers and structures Vol. 82 (2004), pp.829-844.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.003

Google Scholar

[10] A. Messac, G. J. Sundararaj, R. V. Tappeta, J. E. Renaud: Ability of Objective Functions to Generate Points on Nonconvex Pareto Frontiers, AIAA Journal Vol. 38 (2000), pp.1084-1091.

DOI: 10.2514/3.14519

Google Scholar

[11] S. N. Omkar, D. Mudigere, G. N. Naik, S. Gopalakrishnan: Vector evaluated particle swarm optimization (VEPSO) for multi-objective design optimization of composite structures, Computers and structures Vol. 86 (2008), pp.1-14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.06.004

Google Scholar

[12] W. Stadler, J. Duer: Multicriteria optimization in engineering : A tutorial and survy, In Structural optimization : Status and future. American institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (1992), pp.209-249.

Google Scholar

[13] S. M. Yang, D. G. Shao, Y. J. Luo: A novel evolution strategy for multiobjective optimization problem, Applied Mathematics and Computation Vol. 170 (2005), pp.850-873.

DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.12.025

Google Scholar

[14] L. Zadeh: Optimality and non scalar-valued performance criteria, Transactions on Automatic Control Vol. 8 (1963), pp.59-60.

DOI: 10.1109/tac.1963.1105511

Google Scholar