Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in Erhai Lake Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey

Abstract:

The contingent valuation method is one of the most significant approaches of non-market valuation techniques and has been used widely. The authors take it as a tool to analyze the economic benefits of restoring ecosystem service in an impaired river basin， Erhai lake basin. To obtain accurate benefit estimates using CVM technique requires detailed descriptions of the resources being valued. Results from 100 in-person interviews indicate that 84.7% of the households in Erhai lake basin would like to pay for restoring the ecosystem services of Erhai. The analysis of the payment card data shows that the average willingness to pay (WTP) is 80.325 RMB Yuan per household per year. The annual aggregate benefits of restoring ecosystem services of Erhai lake Basin is at least 6.426×107 RMB Yuan，calculated by the number of the households about 800,000 in the Erhai lake basin. This result is a conservative estimate for the economic value of restoring the ecosystem services of Erhai lake basin because of the positive externalities of restoring the ecosystem services on the outside of Erhai lake basin.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 433-440)
• Pages: 1208-1212
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.1208
• Online since: January 2012
• Authors: Wei Juan Mao, Ping Ning, Guang Fei Qu, Shang Hua Luo
• Keywords: Contingent Valuation Method, Economic Value, Erhai Lake Basin, Willingness to Accept, Willingness to Pay

References

[1] Loomis J B，Walsh R G．Recreation Economic Decisions，Comparing Benefits and Costs (second edition)．State College Pennsylvania：Venture Publishing，Ine．1997，1～440.

[2] Li Zhaolin, Cen Hua. Erhai basin environment present situation analysis. Yunnan geographical environment research, 2002, 14 (1): 54 ~60.

[3] Hanemann W M．Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics，1984，66：332～341.

DOI: 10.2307/1240800

[4] Park T, Loomis J, Creel M. Confidence intervals for evaluating benefit estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies [J]: Land Economy, 1991, 61: 64～73.

DOI: 10.2307/3146486

[5] He Guizhen, Lu Yonglong. Application condition value assessment law to the Wuli Lake in Wuxi City comprehensive program of public order appraisal. Ecology journal, 2007, 27 (1): 270~280.

[6] Chen Lin, Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke，et al. Valuation method in the evaluation of non-market value of the application. Ecology journal, 2006, 26 (2): 610~619.

[7] Luo Shanghua. The urbanized advancement affects and regulates the countermeasure research to the Huangpu River rivers ecosystem service. Fudan University master's degree paper.

[8] Loomis J B，Kent P，Strange L，et a1．Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin：Results from a contingent valuation survey[J]．Ecological Economics，2000，(33)：103～117.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00131-7

[9] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong etc.. Ecosystem Services restoration of the total economic value assessment in Ejinaqi [J]. Geographical Journal, 2002, 57 (1): 107 ~ 116.

[10] Venkatachalam L．The contingent valuation method：a review．Environmental Impact Assessment Review，2004，24：89～124.