The Limiting Performance Analysis of the Shock Isolation System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The conventional design of the shock isolation system has focused on selecting suitable stiffness only, so high shock isolation efficiency always gives rise to large relative displacement. In order to design an optimal passive shock isolator, the limiting performance of the shock isolation system is analyzed. The relationship between the shock isolation criterion and the critical initial velocity is studied. The optimal control force is derived and the possibility of engineering implementation of the optimal control force is discussed. The limiting performance analysis shows that the performance of the optimal shock isolator is much more excellent than that of the conventional shock isolator.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 468-471)

Pages:

1167-1171

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.E. Crede, Vibration and Shock Isolation, Wiley, New York, 1951.

Google Scholar

[2] C.M. Harris, Shock and vibration Handbook, McGraw-Hill, third edition, New York, 1988.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhao Yinglong, He Lin, Huang Yingyun, Journal of vibration and shock 24 (2005) 71-76. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] J.S. Rudolph, C.P. Henry, Naval shock analysis and design, The shock and vibration information analysis center booz, Allen and Hamilton, inc. USA, 2000.

Google Scholar

[5] D.V. Balandin, N.N. Bolotnik, W.D. Pilkey. Shock, and Vibration, Gordon and Breach, NJ, 1999.

Google Scholar

[6] E.Sevin, W.D. Pilkey, Optimum Shock and Vibration Isolation, Shock and Vibration Information Analysis Center, Washington, D.C. 1971.

DOI: 10.1177/058310247200400206

Google Scholar

[7] W.D. Pilkey, Weize Kang, Uwe Schramm. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 27 (1997) 7-17.

Google Scholar

[8] Richard W. Kent, Sergey V. Purtsezov, Walter D. Pilkey. International Journal of Impact Engineering 34 (2007) 1382–1395.

Google Scholar

[9] J.M. Kelly. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 28 (1999) 3–20.

Google Scholar

[10] N.C. Shekhar, H.Hatwal and A.K. Malik. Journal of Sound and vibration 214 (1998) 589-603.

Google Scholar

[11] N.C. Shekhar, H.Hatwal and A.K. Malik. Journal of Sound and vibration 227 (1999) 293-307.

Google Scholar