Femtosecond Laser Machining of High Permeability Permalloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Magnetic sensors are widely used in areas such as high-density magnetic recording, navigation, military and security, target detection and tracking, anti-theft systems, non-destructive testing, magnetic marking and labeling, geomagnetic measurements, space research, measurements of magnetic fields onboard spacecraft and biomagnetic measurements in the body 1. For magnetic sensors used to detect weak magnetic fields, a highly sensitive sensing element, with extremely high permeability, is needed. Permalloy is useful due to its initial high permeability and near-zero magnetostriction. Current fabrication methods used to produce these sensing elements include sputtering, electroplating, cold drawing and wet etching. Laser ablation, however, has always not been seriously considered due to domain pinning effects induced by nanosecond lasers2. Femtosecond laser machining, on the other hand, has shown great potential in processing such soft magnetic materials without affecting its permeability. In fact, Jia et al. had observed that when femtosecond laser micromachining was carried out on FINEMET, the amorphous phase was observed to remain in the damaged zone and few crystallization was found in the ablation zone3.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

363-370

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Phan and H. Peng, Progress in Materials Science 53, 323 (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Zeleňáková, P. Kollár, Z. Vértesy et al., Scripta Materialia 44, 613 (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] W. Jia, Z.N. Peng, Z.J. Wang et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 1299 (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] S. -S. Wellershoff, J. Hohlfeld, J. Güdde et al., Appl. Phys. A 69 [Suppl. S99 (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] B. J. Siwick, J. R. Dwyer, R. E. Jordan et al., Science 302 (2003).

Google Scholar

[6] Q.Z. Zhao, S. Malzer, and L.J. Wang, Optics Express 15 (24), 15741 (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] A.Y. Vorobyev, V.S. Makin, and C. Guo, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 034903 (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Wang and C. Guo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 251914 (2005).

Google Scholar

[9] M.I. Kaganov, I.M. Lifshitz, and L.V. Tanatarov, ZH. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31, 232 (1996) [Sov. Phys JETP 4, 173 (1957)].

Google Scholar

[10] S. -S. Wellershoff, J. Güdde, J. Hohlfeld et al., SPIE 3343, 378 (1998).

Google Scholar

[11] Ch. Dufour, E. Paumier, and M. Toulemonde, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 122, 445 (1997).

Google Scholar

[12] A. Borowiec and H.K. Haugen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 (25), 4462 (2003).

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Hirayama and M. Obara, Appl. Surf. Sci. 197 - 198, 741 (2002).

Google Scholar

[14] R. Cerny, V. Chab, G. Ivlev et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 10685 (1999).

Google Scholar

[15] G. Herzer, IEEE Trans. Magn., 26(5), 1397 (1990).

Google Scholar

[16] F. Pfeifer, and C.J. Radeloff, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 19(1-3), 190 (1980).

Google Scholar

[17] G.C. Chi, C.J. Mogab, A.D. Burtherus et al., J. Appl. Phys. 52 (3), 2439 (1981).

Google Scholar