Multi-Function Manipulator

Abstract:

This paper is for ordinary lathe supporting and design the capture of manipulator. Practice has proved, industrial robots can replace the hands of heavy labor, significantly reduce the labor intensity, improve working conditions, and improve labor productivity and automation level. In addition, it can be in high temperature, low temperature, deep water,cosmos, radioactive and other toxic, pollution environment conditions operation, more shows its superiority, with broad prospects. In the paper, the structure of the manipulator model design and Cortex-M0 micro controller (hereinafter referred to as M0) as the main controller in this paper. With multiple steering gear as the basis, make manipulator model, through the realization to the output M0 PWM control more than the steering gear, and finally achieve the acquirement manipulator workpiece, and the workpiece in designated spot.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 546-547)
• Pages: 1602-1607
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.546-547.1602
• Online since: July 2012
• Authors: Zu Lin Wang, Jian Fei Ouyang, Qiang Fang, Yuan Liu
• Keywords: Component, Cortex-M0, Machine Hand, PWM, Steering Engine

References

[1] Dumetz, E., Dieulot, J.Y., Barre, P.J., Colas, F., Delplace, T.: Control of an industrial robot using acceleration feedback. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 46 (2), 111–128 (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/s10846-006-9042-8

[2] van Dijk, N.J.M., van de Wouw, N., Nijmeijer, H., Pancras, W.C.M.: Path-constrained motion planning for robotics based on kinematic constraints. In: Proc. of IDETC/CIE ASME (2007).

DOI: 10.1115/detc2007-34780

[3] Lombai, F., Szederkenyi, G.: Throwing motion generation using nonlinear optimization on a 6-degree-of-freedom robot manipulator. In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Mecha-tronics (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/icmech.2009.4957138

[4] Lombai, F., Szederkenyi, G.: Trajectory tracking control of a 6-degree-of-freedom robot arm us-ing nonlinear optimization. Advanced Motion Control, 2008 AMC '08. 10th IEEE International Workshop on 26–28 March 2008, p.655–660 (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/amc.2008.4516144

[5] Piazzi, A., Visioli, A.: An interval algorithm for minimum-jerk trajectory planning of robot manipulators. In: Proc. of the 36th Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 2, p.1924–1927(1997).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1997.657874

[6] Simon, D., Isik, C.: A trigonometric trajectory generator for robotic arms. Int. J. Contr. 57 (3), 505–517 (1993).

DOI: 10.1080/00207179308934404

[7] Kyriakopoulos, K.J., Saridis, G.N.: Minimum jerk path generation. In: Proc. of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, p.364–369 (1988).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1988.12075

[8] Saramago, S.F.P., Steffen Jr., V.: Optimal trajectory planning of robot manipulators in the presence of moving obstacles. Mech. Mach. Theory35 (8), 1079–1094 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0094-114x(99)00062-2

[9] Saramago, S.F.P., Steffen Jr., V.: Optimization of the trajectory planning of robot manipulators tacking into account the dynamics of the system. Mech. Mach. Theory 33 (7), 883–894 (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0094-114x(97)00110-9

[10] Field, G., Stepanenko, Y.: Iterative dynamic programming: an approach to minimum energy trajectory planning for robotic manipulators. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, p.2755–2760 (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1996.506579

[11] Von Stryk, O., Schlemmer, M.: Optimal control of the industrial robot Manutec r3. In: Bulirsch,R., Kraft, D. (eds. ) Computational Optimal Control. International Series of Numerical Mathe-matics, vol. 115, p.367–382 (1994).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8497-6_30

[12] Piazzi, A., Visioli, A.: Global minimum-time trajectory planning of mechanical manipulatorsusing interval analysis. Int. J. Contr. 71 (4), 631–652 (1998).

DOI: 10.1080/002071798221713