Quality Attributes of Four Major Retails Cuts from Songjiang Cattle

Article Preview

Abstract:

The quality characteristic of High Rib (HR), Striploin (SL), Brisket (BK) and Rump (RP) from Songjiang cattle was investigated. The water content, crude protein, intramuscular fat (IMF), color, shear force, pH, cooking loss and sensory evaluation of samples were analyzed. The results showed that, HR sample had the highest (P < 0.05) IMF and RP sample had the highest (P < 0.05) water content. Although crude protein contents among different of samples had significant difference (P < 0.05), its difference was not large as IMF and water content. Cooking loss and hardness value of HR were both lower than other cuts, whereas a* values was not the highest one (P < 0.05). Hardness and cooking loss were both lowest (P < 0.05) in SL, and highest in RP and BK, respectively. The results demonstrated that quality of HR and SL was better than other cuts, and IMF was the key factor that induced the beef quality difference.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 554-556)

Pages:

1160-1164

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Andrés, I. Murray, E. Navajas, A. Fisher, N. Lambe, and L. Bunger, Prediction of sensory characteristics of lamb meat samples by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy, Meat Science. 76 (2007) 509-516.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.01.011

Google Scholar

[2] C. Venel, A. M. Mullen, G. Downey, and D. Troy, Prediction of tenderness and other quality attributes of beef by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy between 750 and 1100 nm; further studies, Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy. 9 (2001) 185-198.

DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.305

Google Scholar

[3] M. L. Ahnström, M. C. Hunt, and K. Lundström, Effects of pelvic suspension of beef carcasses on quality and physical traits of five muscles from four gender-age groups, Meat Science. 90 (2012) 528-535.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.09.003

Google Scholar

[4] A. Serrano, J. Librelotto, S. Cofrades, F. Sanchez-Muniz, and F. Jiménez-Colmenero, Composition and physicochemical characteristics of restructured beef steaks containing walnuts as affected by cooking method, Meat Science. 77 (2007) 304-313.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.03.017

Google Scholar

[5] J. Aalhus, S. Jones, A. Tong, L. Jeremiah, W. Robertson, and L. Gibson, The combined effects of time on feed, electrical stimulation and aging on beef quality, Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 72 (1992) 525-535.

DOI: 10.4141/cjas92-065

Google Scholar

[6] M. S. Brewer and J. Novakofski, Cooking rate, pH and final endpoint temperature effects on color and cook loss of a lean ground beef model system, Meat Science. 52 (1999) 443-451.

DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00028-5

Google Scholar

[7] M. Viljoen, L. Hoffman, and T. Brand, Prediction of the chemical composition of mutton with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy, Small Ruminant Research. 69 (2007) 88-94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.12.019

Google Scholar

[8] E. Delgado, M. Rubio, F. Iturbe, R. Méndez, L. Cassís, and R. Rosiles, Composition and quality of Mexican and imported retail beef in Mexico, Meat Science. 69 (2005) 465-471.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.10.003

Google Scholar

[9] V. Alonso, M. M. Campo, L. Provincial, P. Roncalés, and J. A. Beltrán, Effect of protein level in commercial diets on pork meat quality, Meat Science. 85 (2010) 7-14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.11.015

Google Scholar

[10] G. Stolowski, B. Baird, R. Miller, J. Savell, A. Sams, J. Taylor, J. Sanders, and S. Smith, Factors influencing the variation in tenderness of seven major beef muscles from three Angus and Brahman breed crosses, Meat Science. 73 (2006) 475-483.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.01.006

Google Scholar

[11] N. Prieto, R. Roehe, P. Lavín, G. Batten, and S. Andrés, Application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict meat and meat products quality: A review, Meat Science. 83 (2009) 175-186.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.04.016

Google Scholar

[12] M. D. Aaslyng, C. Bejerholm, P. Ertbjerg, H. C. Bertram, and H. J. Andersen, Cooking loss and juiciness of pork in relation to raw meat quality and cooking procedure, Food quality and preference. 14 (2003) 277-288.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00086-1

Google Scholar

[13] T. Nishimura, A. Hattori, and K. Takahashi, Structural changes in intramuscular connective tissue during the fattening of Japanese Black cattle: effect of marbling on beef tenderization, Journal of Animal Science. 77 (1999) 93.

DOI: 10.2527/1999.77193x

Google Scholar

[14] P. Toscas, F. Shaw, and S. Beilken, Partial least squares (PLS) regression for the analysis of instrument measurements and sensory meat quality data, Meat Science. 52 (1999) 173-178.

DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(98)00165-x

Google Scholar

[15] L. Meinert, S. C. Christiansen, L. Kristensen, C. Bjergegaard, and M. D. Aaslyng, Eating quality of pork from pure breeds and DLY studied by focus group research and meat quality analyses, Meat Science. 80 (2008) 304-314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.12.021

Google Scholar