Evaluation Model of Aircraft Maintenance Mode Based on Improved AHP

Article Preview

Abstract:

By analyzing Maintenance Significant Item (MSI) standard procedures of Maintenance Steering Group-3(MSG-3), building optimal evaluation index of maintenance mode selection, an improved hierarchy model based on MSG-3 is established for evaluation of maintenance mode. Scale selection and layer weight confirmation is improved to solve the sort of index weight in evaluation. It makes maintenance mode selection more reasonable. The hierarchy model is implemented on .NET platform. The simulation result proves the validity of the method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 605-607)

Pages:

308-313

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Chellappan Sriram, Ali Haghani. An optimization model for aircraft maintenance scheduling and re-assignment[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2003(37): 29-48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(02)00004-6

Google Scholar

[2] P. A. Scarf. On the application of mathematical models in maintenance[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 99(4): 493-506.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(96)00316-5

Google Scholar

[3] Marvin Rausand: Reliability centered maintenance, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1998, 60(2). 121-132.

DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(98)83005-6

Google Scholar

[4] Air Transport Association: MSG-3 Operator/Manufacturer Scheduled Maintenance Development [S]. U.S. A: Air Transport Association, Inc, 2005. 15-47.

Google Scholar

[5] Yu J, Song G F, Bai S. Overall evaluation based on Supplier's development-Integration of AHP and DEA[J]. Journal of Shang-Hai University(Natural Science), 2002, 8(5): 463-470.

Google Scholar

[6] Jiaxue Liu, Xiaowei Zhang, Jiankang Dong. A Novel Quantified Method for Flight Operation Safety,Second International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation,Jan. 22-Jan . 24, 2010,Sanya,China,Vol1,pp.215-218.

DOI: 10.1109/iccms.2010.18

Google Scholar

[7] LUO Zheng-qing, YANG Shan-lin. Comparative Study on Several Scales in AHP[J]. Chinese Journal of Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2004, 9 (9) . 51- 60.

Google Scholar