Properties of Mortar Containing Rice Husk Ash at Different Temperature and Exposed to Aggressive Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

The properties of mortar containing rice husk ash at varying temperatures were studied. Three rice husk ash samples were prepared at different temperatures and with various colors, i.e., 600°C (pink), 800°C (grey), and 1000°C (white), all were used for this study. Ordinary Portland cement (OPC), a well known universal binder, was partially replaced with rice husk ash at 10, 15, 20, and 30% by weight of binder. The water to binder ratio (W/B) of the mortar was kept constant at 0.45. The mortars were subjected to seawater or saturated Ca (OH)2 solution. The controlled and exposed mortars were characterized using X-ray diffraction, FTIR spectroscopy and compressive strength test. The results show that the amount of silica present in RHA are varied with burning temperature and colors, approximately in the range of 95 to 97%. White RHA produced higher compressive strength both in seawater and Ca (OH)2 solution. Finally, white RHA with 15% replacement was most suitable to be used as additive in OPC, and showed good potential for use in seawater applications and alkaline environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

87-93

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. C. Lanning: J. Agric. Food. Chem. Vol. 11 (1963), pp.435-437.

Google Scholar

[2] J. D. Jones: Can. Metals. Vol. 16 (1953), pp.22-24.

Google Scholar

[3] A. A. Boating and D. H. Skeete: Cement Mortar Res. Vol. 20 (1990), p.795–802.

Google Scholar

[4] J. James and M. Subba Rao: Thermochimica Acta. Vol. 97 (1986), p.329–336.

Google Scholar

[5] M. A. Hamad and I. A. Khattab: Thermochimica Acta. Vol. 48 (1981), p.343–349.

Google Scholar

[6] P. K. Metha: ACI Mater. J. Vol. 74 (1977), p.440–442.

Google Scholar

[7] M. H. Zhang and M. Malhotra: ACI Mater. J. Vol. 93 (1996), p.629–636.

Google Scholar

[8] M. S. Ismail and A. M. Waliuddin: Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 10 (1996), pp.521-526.

Google Scholar

[9] G. S. Rodriguez: Cement and Concrete Composites. Vol. 28 (2006), pp.158-160.

Google Scholar

[10] K. Ganesan, K. Rajagopal and K. Thangavel: Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 22 (2008), p.1675–1683.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Chindaprasirt, P. Kanchanda, A. Sathonsaowaphak and H. T. Cao: Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 21 (2007), pp.1356-1361.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.10.005

Google Scholar

[12] J. S. Coutinho: Cement and Concrete Composites. Vol. 25 (2002), pp.51-59.

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM C109/C109M–11b. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). American Society for Testing and Materials.

DOI: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-99

Google Scholar

[14] BS EN 197-1: 2011. Cement. Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. BS EN British Standards.

Google Scholar

[15] Q. Feng, H. Yamamichi, M. Shoya and S. Sugita: Cem. Concr. Res. Vol. 34 (2004), p.521–526.

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Shinonara and N. Kohyama: Industrial Health 2004, 42, 277-285.

Google Scholar

[17] A.M. Neville, Properties of Concrete. Pitman Publishing Limited, London, ( 1977), p.9.

Google Scholar