Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bars to Perform Large Strain Compression Tests on Neoprene at Intermediate and High Strain Rates

Article Preview

Abstract:

The strain rate sensitivity of neoprene is characterized using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system at intermediate (50 s-1, 100 s-1) and high (500 s-1, 1000 s-1) strain rates. We used two quartz piezoelectric force transducers that were sandwiched between the specimen and experimental bars respectively to directly measure the weak wave signals. A laser gap gage was employed to monitor the deformation of the sample directly. Three kinds of neoprene rubbers (Shore hardness: SHA60, SHA65, and SHA70) were tested using the modified split Hopkinson pressure bar. Experimental results show that the modified apparatus is effective and reliable for determining the compressive stress-strain responses of neoprene at intermediate and high strain rates.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 631-632)

Pages:

458-462

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Delhaye, A. Clausen, F. Moussy, et al., Mechanical response and microstructure investigation of a mineral and rubber modified polypropylene, Polymer Testing. 29(2010) 793-802.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.07.001

Google Scholar

[2] M.S. Hoo Fatt,X. Ouyang, Integral-based constitutive equation for rubber at high strain rates, International Journal of Solids and Structures. 44(2007) 6491-6506.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.038

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Chen, Z.Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, et al., Crush dynamics of square honeycomb thin rubber wall, Thin-Walled Structures. 47(2009) 1447-1456.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.07.007

Google Scholar

[4] W.Q. Song, P. Beggs,M. Easton, Compressive strain-rate sensitivity of magnesium–aluminum die casting alloys, Materials & Design. 30(2009) 642-648.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.050

Google Scholar

[5] S. Seo, O. Min,H. Yang, Constitutive equation for Ti-6Al-4V at high temperatures measured using the SHPB technique, International Journal of Impact Engineering. 31(2005) 735-754.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.04.010

Google Scholar

[6] W. Chen, B. Song, D. Frew, et al., Dynamic small strain measurements of a metal specimen with a split Hopkinson pressure bar, Experimental Mechanics. 43(2003) 20-23.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02410479

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Feng, N. Tao, Z. Zhu, et al., Effect of aging treatment on the quasi-static and dynamic compressive properties of aluminum alloy foams, Materials Letters. 57(2003) 4058-4063.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(03)00265-9

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Li,H. Meng, About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test, International journal of Solids and Structures. 40(2003) 343-360.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(02)00526-7

Google Scholar

[9] D. Grote, S. Park,M. Zhou, Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures: I. experimental characterization, International Journal of Impact Engineering. 25(2001) 869-886.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(01)00020-3

Google Scholar

[10] H. Zhao,G. Gary, On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains, International journal of Solids and Structures. 33(1996) 3363-3375.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00186-7

Google Scholar

[11] G. Ravichandran,G. Subhash, Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing of ceramics in a split Hopkinson pressure bar, Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 77(1994) 263-267.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.x

Google Scholar

[12] W. Chen,H. Luo, Dynamic compressive responses of intact and damaged ceramics from a single split Hopkinson pressure bar experiment, Experimental Mechanics. 44(2004) 295-299.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02427896

Google Scholar

[13] J. Yuan, J. Ma,G.E.B. Tan, Specimen Stress Equilibrium in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Tests of Ceramics at High Strain Rate, Mechanical Properties and Performance of Engineering Ceramics and Composites VI. 2011) 53-66.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118095355.ch5

Google Scholar

[14] W. Chen, B. Zhang,M. Forrestal, A split Hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance materials, Experimental Mechanics. 39(1999) 81-85.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02331109

Google Scholar

[15] D. Frew, M.J. Forrestal,W. Chen, Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar, Experimental Mechanics. 42(2002) 93-106.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02411056

Google Scholar

[16] D. Frew, M.J. Forrestal,W. Chen, A split Hopkinson pressure bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials, Experimental Mechanics. 41(2001) 40-46.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02323102

Google Scholar

[17] W. Chen, F. Lu,B. Zhou, A quartz-crystal-embedded split Hopkinson pressure bar for soft materials, Experimental Mechanics. 40(2000) 1-6.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02327540

Google Scholar

[18] P. Zhao, F. Lu, R. Chen, et al., A technique for combined dynamic compression-shear test, Review of Scientific Instruments. 82(2011) 035110.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3557826

Google Scholar