The Study of Surface Modification and Biocompatibility of Porous Titanium

Article Preview

Abstract:

A hydroxyapatite coating on the porous titanium surface was prepared by NaOH-treated and heat treatment followed by immersing into a supersaturated calcium phosphate solution. It is found that the porous titanium was in an open-cell microstructure. The morphology, element content and phase composition of the hydroxyapatite coating were also analyzed. The cytotoxicity of porous titanium surface were tested. The results showed the hydroxyapatite of porous titanium surface by NaOH-treated and heat treatment was attached uniformly and had a certain thickness after immersion into the simulated body fluid (SBF) solution for 5 days, the hydroxyapatite coating was formed after immersion into the SBF solution for 12 days, it demonstrated good biocompatibility and enhancement of biological activity, it was conducive to the proliferation and adhesion of osteoblasts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

104-110

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Nishiguchi Shigeru, Kato Hirofumi, Fujita Hiroshi et al. Biomaterials[J], 2001, 22 (18): 2525-2533.

Google Scholar

[2] Huiskes R, Weinans H, Rieberger B. Clin Orthop Relat Res[J], 1992, 274: 124.

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Peisheng, et a1. Acta Mechanica Sinica [J], 2001, 33 (6): 853.

Google Scholar

[4] Jiang Shuwen, et a1. Materials Science and Engineering [J], 2002, 20(4): 597.

Google Scholar

[5] Ha zan R, Oron U. J Orthop Res1993, 11: 655-663.

Google Scholar

[6] Ha zan R, Oron U. Clin Mater 1991, 7: 45-49.

Google Scholar

[7] Lu X, Wang Y, Yang X, Zha ng Q, Zhao Z, Weng LT, Leng Y. Spectroscopic J Bio med Mater Res 2008, 84A: 52 3-534.

Google Scholar

[8] Serro AP, Saramago B. Bio materials 2003, 24: 4749-4760.

Google Scholar

[9] Sui YT. Biomaterials 2003, 24: 3893-3907.

Google Scholar

[10] Ha zan R, Br ener R, Oron U. Biomateri als1993, 14: 570-574.

Google Scholar

[11] Kato H, Nakamura T, Nis higuchi S, Matsu sue Y, Kobayashi M, Miyazaki T, Hyun-Min K, Kokubo T. Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 2000, 53: 28-35.

Google Scholar

[12] Liu Q, Ding J, Mante FK, Wunder SL, Baran GR. Biom aterials2002, 23: 3103-3111.

Google Scholar

[13] Sykaras N, Lacop ino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Int J Oral Maxil lofac Implants 2000, 15: 675-690.

Google Scholar

[14] Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffrezic N, Comte V, Lagneau C, Lissac M, Mart elet C. Mater Sci Eng 2003, 23: 551-560.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-4931(03)00033-x

Google Scholar

[15] Anselme K. Biomaterials[J], 2000, 21 (7): 667-681.

Google Scholar

[16] Miy azaki T, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Miyaji T, Kato H, Nakamura T. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001, 12: 683-687.

Google Scholar

[17] Wang XX, Hayakawa S, Tsuru K Osaka A. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 54: 172-178.

Google Scholar

[18] Vanzillotta PS, Sader MS, Bastos IV, Soares G. de Almeida. Dental Mater 2006, 2: 275-282.

Google Scholar