Study on Artificial Bone Scaffolds with Control Release of Drugs by Low-Temperature Rapid Prototyping Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

A kind of PLGA microspheres was prepared with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the model drug and poly (lactide-co-glycolide) as the matrix. The polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite (PLA/HA) scaffold was manufactured through 3D printing technology. Then the PLGA microspheres were composited in the scaffold. It was also explored about the feasibility of skeletal scaffolds loaded with bone growth factor. The BSA loading PLGA microspheres were prepared by W/O/W method and the scaffolds were prepared by 3D-printing using PLA and HA as raw materials. The composite scaffold was fabricated by adsorbing the microspheres/ethanol suspension into scaffolds under negative pressure. The cell-adhesion ability, hydrophilicity, scaffold morphology, release properties and biocompatibility of the composite scaffold were characterized, respectively. The results show no burst release of BSA from the PLGA microspheres at beginning stage and sustained longer than 35 days. Drug-loading rate of microspheres was 0.64%. PLA/HA scaffold shows enhanced hydrophilicity as well as excellent cell compatibility and cell adhesion property. SEM images show PLGA microspheres were successfully absorbed in PLA/HA scaffold. MTT experiments of the composite scaffold show non cytotoxic and its cell relative proliferation rate is up to 88.37%. These studies show the feasibility of skeletal scaffolds loaded with bone growth factor. Through low-temperature rapid prototyping technology, the long-effective bioactive bone scaffold can be prepared and have a well application prospect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

269-277

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yang, S., et al., The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part II. Rapid prototyping techniques. Tissue Engineering, 2002. 8(1): pp.1-11.

DOI: 10.1089/107632702753503009

Google Scholar

[2] Chua, C., W. Yeong, and K. Leong, Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: a state-of-the-art report. Virtual Modelling and Rapid Manufacturing, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] Peltola, S.M., et al., A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Annals of medicine, 2008. 40(4): pp.268-280.

DOI: 10.1080/07853890701881788

Google Scholar

[4] Yan, Y., et al., Rapid prototyping and manufacturing technology: principle, representative technics, applications, and development trends. Tsinghua Science & Technology, 2009. 14: pp.1-12.

DOI: 10.1016/s1007-0214(09)70059-8

Google Scholar

[5] Yeong, W.Y., et al., Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. TRENDS in Biotechnology, 2004. 22(12): pp.643-652.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.10.004

Google Scholar

[6] Russias, J., et al., Fabrication and mechanical properties of PLA/HA composites: A study of in vitro degradation. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2006. 26(8): pp.1289-1295.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.004

Google Scholar

[7] Kricheldorf, H.R., Syntheses and application of polylactides. Chemosphere, 2001. 43(1): pp.49-54.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00323-4

Google Scholar

[8] Higashi, S., et al., Polymer-hydroxyapatite composites for biodegradable bone fillers. Biomaterials, 1986. 7(3): pp.183-187.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(86)90099-2

Google Scholar

[9] Wang, M., et al., A dual microsphere based on PLGA and chitosan for delivering the oligopeptide derived from BMP-2. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2011. 96(1): pp.107-113.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.10.010

Google Scholar

[10] Lee, J.H., J.W. Park, and H.B. Lee, Cell adhesion and growth on polymer surfaces with hydroxyl groups prepared by water vapour plasma treatment. Biomaterials, 1991. 12(5): pp.443-448.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90140-6

Google Scholar

[11] Rezwan, K., et al., Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2006. 27(18): pp.3413-3431.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039

Google Scholar

[12] Landers, R., et al., Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2002. 23(23): pp.4437-4447.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00139-4

Google Scholar

[13] Gumbiner, B.M., Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell, 1996. 84(3): p.345.

DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81279-9

Google Scholar

[14] Ghosh, D. and J. Sengupta, Molecular mechanism of embryo-endometrial adhesion in primates: a future task for implantation biologists. Molecular human reproduction, 1998. 4(8): pp.733-735.

DOI: 10.1093/molehr/4.8.733

Google Scholar

[15] Hersel, U., C. Dahmen, and H. Kessler, RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials, 2003. 24(24): pp.4385-4415.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00343-0

Google Scholar

[16] Hallab, N., et al., Cell adhesion to biomaterials: correlations between surface charge, surface roughness, adsorbed protein, and cell morphology. Journal of long-term effects of medical implants, 1995. 5(3): p.209.

Google Scholar

[17] Anselme, K., Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials, 2000. 21(7): pp.667-681.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00242-2

Google Scholar

[18] Zhang, R. and P.X. Ma, Poly (α-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite porous composites for bone-tissue engineering. I. Preparation and morphology. (1999).

Google Scholar

[19] Burg, K.J.L., S. Porter, and J.F. Kellam, Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2000. 21(23): pp.2347-2359.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00102-2

Google Scholar