An Improved Back-Projection Algorithm for Magnetic Induction Tomography Image Reconstruction

Article Preview

Abstract:

Magnetic induction tomography (MIT) acted as a contactless and non-invasive medical imaging technology has aroused wide concern, while a large amount of calculation and a series of convergence problems in the solution of the inverse problem become technical difficulties for MIT. In order to solve these problems, an improved back-projection image reconstruction algorithm based on the magnetic field lines distribution is presented in this paper. Firstly, the eddy current problem of MIT was solved by the finite element method to obtain the magnetic field distribution. Secondly, the back-projection areas were divided according to the magnetic field lines distribution in the homogeneous field. Finally, image reconstruction was realized by projecting the phase shifts back along the corresponding projection area. The reconstruction results for perturbations with different conductivities appearing at different locations reveal that the improved back-projection algorithm for MIT owning the character of high speed performs well in reflecting location and shape information of the perturbation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

630-635

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Griffiths H. Magnetic induction tomography. Meas. Sci. Technol. 12: 1126-1131(2001).

Google Scholar

[2] Gencer N G and Tek M N. Electrical conductivity imaging via contactless measurements. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18: 617-627(1999).

DOI: 10.1109/42.790461

Google Scholar

[3] Merwa R, Hollaus K and Scharfetter H. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT). Physiol. Meas. 26: 241-250(2005).

DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/023

Google Scholar

[4] Puwal S and Roth B J. Fourier-based magnetic induction tomography for mapping resistivity. J Appl Phys. 109 014701(2011).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3554717

Google Scholar

[5] Korjenevsky A V and Cherepenin V A. Magnetic induction tomography. J. Commun. Tech. Electron. 42: 469-474(1997).

Google Scholar

[6] Li Shijun, Qin Mingxin and Dong Xiuzhen. Magnetic induction tomography and the methods of its experimental realization. Foreign Medical Science(biomedical engineering fascicle). 25: 161-164(2002).

Google Scholar

[7] Wang Cong and Liu Ruigang. Image reconstruction algorithm for magnetic induction tomography. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument 29: 2052-2057(2008).

Google Scholar

[8] Korjenevsky A, Cherepenin Vand Sapetsky S. Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization. Physiol. Meas. 21: 89-94(2000).

DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/21/1/311

Google Scholar

[9] Xu Guanxin and He Wei. Fast reconstruction method of electrical impedance tomography and its sensitivity Computer Simulation. 21: 158-160(2004).

Google Scholar

[10] Luo Ciyong, Zhu Qinyou. An improved back-projection algorithm for electrical impedance tomography. Journal of Chongqing University. 32: 243-246(2009).

Google Scholar

[11] Brás N B, Martins R C and Serra A C. A Fast Forward Problem Solver for the Reconstruction of Biological Maps in Magnetic Induction Tomography. IEEE Trans. Magn. 46: 1193-1202(2010).

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2039486

Google Scholar