Spray Characterization of Palm Olein/Diesel Blends under Various Injection Pressures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) and spray cone angle are two important parameters that characterize spray performance. The objective of this study is to characterize palm olein/diesel blends spray in terms of spray angle and SMD under different injection pressures using a hollow cone pressure swirl atomizer. The physical properties of five diesel/palm olein blends, namely B5, B10, B15, B20 and B25 were measured and their spray characteristics were tested at injection pressures of 0.8MPa, 1.0MPa, and 1.2MPa under ambient atmospheric condition. The results were compared to spray established using petroleum diesel fuel. The SMD was measured using a phase Doppler analyzer (PDA). The spray cone angle was visualized using a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera. The results indicated that petroleum diesel fuel had the widest cone angle followed by B5, B10, B15, B20 and B25 under the same injection pressure. Additionally, when the injection pressure increases from 0.8MPa to 1.2MPa, the spray cone angle widen accordingly. It is concluded that high content of palm olein in the palm biofuel blends increases viscosity and surface tension and hence higher value of SMD and narrower spray cone angle was generated. An increase in injection pressure resulted in smaller droplet SMD and wider spray cone angle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

645-653

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Carter, C., et al., Palm oil markets and future supply. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 2007. 109(4): pp.307-314.

Google Scholar

[2] Sumathi, S., S.P. Chai, and A.R. Mohamed, Utilization of oil palm as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008. 12(9): pp.2404-2421.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.006

Google Scholar

[3] Crabbe, E., et al., Biodiesel production from crude palm oil and evaluation of butanol extraction and fuel properties. Process Biochemistry, 2001. 37(1): pp.65-71.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-9592(01)00178-9

Google Scholar

[4] May, C.Y., Development of Palm Biofuels in Malaysia, in MIMA Bulletin2006, Maritime Institute of Malaysia (MIMA): Kuala Lumpur.

Google Scholar

[5] Ma, A.N., et al., Development of Renewable Energy in Malaysia, in Renewable Resources and Renewable Energy A Global Challenge, M. Graziani and P. Fornasiero, Editors. 2006, CRC Press. p.301–313.

DOI: 10.1201/9781420020861.ch14

Google Scholar

[6] Basiron, Y. and Choo, Y.M. Crude Palm Oil as a Source of Biofuel: Its Impact on Price Stabilization and Environment. (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] Basiron, Y., Pushing The Case For Envodiesel, in New Straits Times2006, New Straits Times: Kuala Lumpur.

Google Scholar

[8] Masjuki, M.A.K. a.H.H., Experimental Test of a Diesel Engine using Envo-Diesel as an Alternative Fuel. New Trends and Developments in Automotive System Engineering, ed. M. Chiaberge2011: InTech.

DOI: 10.5772/14039

Google Scholar

[9] 9. Jaafar, M.N.M., et al., Combustion Performance Evaluation of Air Staging of Palm Oil Blends. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012. 46(4): pp.2445-2450.

DOI: 10.1021/es2025005

Google Scholar

[10] Lefebvre, A.H., Gas Turbine Combustion1983: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

Google Scholar

[11] Lefebvre, A.H., Atomization and Sprays1989: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

Google Scholar

[12] Mugele, R.A. and H.D. Evans, Droplet Size Distribution in Sprays. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1951. 43(6): pp.1317-1324.

DOI: 10.1021/ie50498a023

Google Scholar

[13] Kamrak, J., et al., Mechanistic Study on Spraying of Blended Biodiesel Using Phase Doppler Anemometry. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2009. 33(10): pp.1452-1457.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.06.011

Google Scholar

[14] Ejim, C.E., Fleck, B.A. and Amirfazli, A. Analytical Study for Atomization of Biodiesels and Their Blends in a Typical Injector: Surface Tension and Viscosity Effects. Fuel, 2007. 86(10-11): pp.1534-1544.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.11.006

Google Scholar

[15] Lee, C.S., S.W. Park, and K. S.I., An Experimental Study on the Atomization and Combustion Characteristics of Biodiesel-Blended Fuels. Energy & Fuels, 2005. 19: p.2201–2208.

DOI: 10.1021/ef050026h

Google Scholar

[16] Yao, S., J. Zhang, and T. Fang. Effect of Viscosities on the Instability of Sprays from a Swirl Atomizer. in ILASS Americas, 22nd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. 2010. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Google Scholar

[17] Park, S.H., H.K. Suh, and C.S. Lee, Effect of Bioethanol - Biodiesel Blending Ratio on Fuel Spray Behavior and Atomization Characteristics. Energy & Fuels, 2009. 23(8): pp.4092-4098.

DOI: 10.1021/ef900068a

Google Scholar

[18] Chen, S.K., A.H. Lefebvre, and J. Rollbuhler, Factors Influencing the Effective Spray Cone Angle of Pressure-Swirl Atomizers. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1992. 114(1): pp.97-103.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2906313

Google Scholar

[19] Callahan, T.J., et al. Effects of Fuel Properties on Diesel Spray Characteristics. in SAE Technical Paper Series. (1987).

DOI: 10.4271/870533

Google Scholar

[20] Rizk, N.K. and A.H. Lefebvre. Prediction of Velocity Coefficient and Spray Cone Angle for Simplex Swirl Atomizers in Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray System 1985. London.

DOI: 10.1515/tjj.1987.4.1-2.65

Google Scholar

[21] Dantec, D., BSA Flow Software Version 4. 10 Installation & User's Guide 2006, Skovlunde, Denmark: Dantec Dynamics A/S.

Google Scholar

[22] Park, S.W., S. Kim, and C.S. Lee, Effect of Mixing Ratio of Biodiesel on Breakup Mechanisms of Monodispersed Droplets. Energy & Fuels, 2006. 20(4): pp.1709-1715.

DOI: 10.1021/ef050372z

Google Scholar

[23] Park, S.H., et al., A Study on the Fuel Injection and Atomization Characteristics of Soybean Oil Methyl Eter (SME). International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2009. 30(1): pp.108-116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.11.002

Google Scholar