Effect of Rotating Tool Electrode on Machining of Titanium Alloy Using Electric Discharge Machining

Article Preview

Abstract:

Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is a well established non-conventional machining process used for machining complex and hard material parts that are difficult to machine by conventional machining process. The non-contact machining process has been continuously evolving from a mere tool and dies making process to a micro-scale application machining alternative attracting a significant amount of research interests. In recent years various research have been done to increase the material removal rate (MRR) and reduction in tool wear rate (TWR). Despite a range of different approaches, the objectives of the present work is to achieve more efficient metal removal coupled with reduction in tool wear rate and comparing these values for a stationary electric discharge machine (EDM) and a rotary electric discharge machine (rotary EDM) by using certain parameters for machining of Titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) work piece and using six different commercially available tools namely Copper, Brass, Tungsten Carbide, Aluminium, Austenitic Stainless Steel 304L and Austenitic Stainless Steel 316.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

448-452

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ASM Hand book, properties and selection : Nonferrous alloys and special purpose Materials, Vol. 2, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang:J. Mater. Process. Technol. 68(1997), p.262.

Google Scholar

[3] R.R. Boyer: Material Science and Engineering A. 213 (1996), P. 103.

Google Scholar

[4] Mitsuo Niinomi: Sci. and Tech. of Aovanced Materials, Vol. 4 Issue 5 (2003), p.445.

Google Scholar

[5] Chen, S.L., Yan, B.H., and Huang, F.Y.: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 87(1999), p.107.

Google Scholar

[6] AhmetHascalik, Ulas C, aydas: Applied Surface Science 253(2007), p.9007.

Google Scholar

[7] J.Y. Kao , C.C. Tsao, S.S. Wang &C.Y. Hsu: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. (2010)47, p.395.

Google Scholar

[8] S.L. CHEN, B.H. Yan, F.Y. Huang: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 87(1999), p.107.

Google Scholar

[9] Chinmaya R. Dandek, YungC. Shin, JohnBarnes: Inter. J of M/c Tools&Manuf. 50(2010), p.395.

Google Scholar

[10] Peter Fonda, Zhigang Wanga, Kazuo Yamazaki, Yuji Akutsu: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 202, Issuues 1-3, 20(2008), p.583.

Google Scholar

[11] C.H.C. Haron, A. Jawaid: J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 166(2005), p.188.

Google Scholar

[12] Bernd M. Schumacher:J. of Mat. Proc. Tech 149 (2004) p.376.

Google Scholar

[13] Anand Pandey, Shankar Singh: Inter. J Engg. Sci. & Tech. 2 (2010), p.2172.

Google Scholar

[14] K.H. Ho,S.T. Newman: Inter. J. Machine Tools&Manuf. 43 (2003), p.1287.

Google Scholar

[15] M.A. Norliana, D.G. Solomon, Md.F. Bahari: Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. 47(2007)p.1214.

Google Scholar

[16] Shankar Singh, S. Maheswari, P.C. Pandey:J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. 149(2004), p.272.

Google Scholar

[17] Narender Singh P, Raghukandan K, Rathnasabapathi M, B. C. Pai, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 155-156 (2004), p.1653.

Google Scholar

[18] Mohan P, Rajadurai A, Sathyanarayana K. G., J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 153-154, (2004), p.978.

Google Scholar

[19] Manoj Kumar Kuttuboina, Uthirapathi. A, Lenin Singaravleu. D, Adv. Mat. Res., 488-489, (2012), p.876.

Google Scholar