Optimization of Co-Culture Condition for Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus with Weak Post-Acidification Ability and Streptococcus thermophilus

Fei Liu; Yue Hua Jiao; Gui Cheng Huo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.655-657.1982

Paper Titles

The Design of Drug Circulation Quality and Safety Control System Based on the Internet of Things
p.1957

Service Life Study of the Artificial Knee-Joints of Crossed Pairing
p.1963

The Application of PVA Antibacterial Film with Clove Oil/β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex in Fruit Packaging
p.1971

Extraction of Fish Oil from the Muscle of Sturgeon Using Supercritical Fluids
p.1975

Optimization of Co-Culture Condition for Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus with Weak Post-Acidification Ability and Streptococcus thermophilus
p.1982

Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of the Ultrasonic Extraction of Polysaccharides from Melaleuca ahemifolia
p.1987

Effect of the Addition of Stearic Acid on Starch Properties
p.1996

Study on the Control Technology Device of Alternating Magnetic Field Inducing the Plants to Breed
p.2001

The Relationship Model of Light Interception and Plant Cultivation Form
p.2006

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 655-657Optimization of Co-Culture Condition for...

Optimization of Co-Culture Condition for Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus with Weak Post-Acidification Ability and Streptococcus thermophilus

Abstract:

To obtain high quality yoghurt starter with low post-acidification, the characteristics of mixed fermentation of yoghurt strains were studied. Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus KLDS 1.9201-11 with reduced post-acidification and Streptococcus thermophilus KLDS 3.9210 were cultivated in 2.5L fermenter with different culture temperature, initial pH and proportion of inoculums, and of which reproductive activity and ratio of viable cell count were compared. It was beneficial for the balance of final ratio of viable cell count between starter strains at the end of fermentation, when grew at 42°C, pH6.2, and the proportion of inoculums of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus KLDS 1.9201-11 and Streptococcus thermophilus KLDS 3.9210 was 2 to 1. These results showed that different culture conditions could affect symbiotic growth of yoghurt strains, and different growth mode was an important prerequisite for collaboration growth of mixed strain and acquisition of yoghurt starter with high quality.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Engineering Solutions for Manufacturing Processes

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 655-657)

Pages:

1982-1986

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.655-657.1982

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Fei Liu, Yue Hua Jiao, Gui Cheng Huo

Keywords:

Bulgaricus, Co-Culture, Lactobacillus delbrueckii Subsp, Post-Acidification, Streptococcus thermophilus

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] F. Y. Ekinci, M. Gurel: Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 91(2008), pp.892-899.

Google Scholar

[2] E. J. Aguirrea, M. G. Galarza: Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 91(2008), pp.4454-4465.

Google Scholar

[3] W.H. Robert, L. N. Nancy: Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76 (1993), pp.2354-2365.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Liu, P. Du, Y. T. Wang: Acta Microbiologica Sinica Vol. 49 (2009), pp.23-29, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] S.N. Rajagopal, W. E. Sandine: Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73 (1990), pp.894-899.

Google Scholar

[6] X. H. Zhang, Y. L. Tang, R. S. Huang: Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University Vol. 31 (1997), pp.82-85.

Google Scholar

[7] C. G. Vinderola, P. Mocchiutti, J. A. Reinheimer: Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 (2002), pp.721-729.

Google Scholar

[8] L. R. Mitchell, W. E. Sandine: Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 69 (1986), pp.2557-2567.

Google Scholar

[9] R. R. Wu, J. Ma, J. W. Pei et al: China Dairy Industry Vol. 31 (2003), pp.9-13, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] S. H. Duan, M. Miao, L. S. Li, Y. Fei: Shi Pin Ke Xue Vol. 26 (2005), pp.278-282, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] L. J. San, H. T. Tian, W. Ma et al: China Dairy Vol. 9 (2006), pp.49-52, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] G. C. Huo, L Cui, F. Liu: Journal of Northeast Agricultural University Vol. 43 (2012), pp.1-3, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] F. Liu, L. J. Yang, G. C. Huo: China Dairy Industry Vol. 37 (2005), pp.11-14, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[14] T. H. Jones, L. Oaimek, M. E. Stiles: Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73 (1989), pp.1164-1172.

Google Scholar