Research on Models of Technology Innovation Systemic Risk and Early Warning of Materials and Manufacturing in SMEs

Article Preview

Abstract:

The prime task for limiting SMEs’ technology innovation systemic risks in materials and manufacturing is to exactly measure and warn the systemic risks.Before the SMEs’ technology innovation crisis in materials and manufacturing ,most of the research focused on how the macro economy shocked the l system,while few of them were interested in the correlation between and among different sectors and markets.This article tried to analyze the latest development of systemic risk measuring method based on the data the models needed,especially for the correlation measurement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 655-657)

Pages:

2344-2347

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ascioglu,A.,S.P. Hegde, and J.B. McDermot, 2005, AuditorCompensation, Disclosure Quality, and Market Liquidity: Evidence fom the Stock Market, Journalof Accounting and Public Policy 24: 325-354.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.05.002

Google Scholar

[2] Bail ey, W., G.A. Karol yi, and C, Salva, 2006, The Eeonomic consequences of Inereased Diselosure: Evidence from International Cross-listings, Journal of Finacial Economics 81(l): 175-213.

Google Scholar

[3] Theodore M . Barnhill Jr. Panagiotis Measuring integrated market and credit risk in bank Portfolios: an application to a set of hypothetical banks operating in South Africa. Financial Markets Institutions & Investments, December (2002).

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0416.11502

Google Scholar

[4] Wing Hoe Woo, Tak Kuen Siu. A dynamic binomial expansion technique for credit risk measurement: a Bayesuab filtering approach. Applied Mathematical Finance. June, 2004. 165-186.

DOI: 10.1080/13504860410001682669

Google Scholar

[5] Simon S.M. Ho , Kevin C.K. Lam and Heibatollah Sami, The investment opportunity set, director ownership, and corporate policies, evidence from an emerging market, Journal of Corporate Finance 10, 2004, p.383–408.

DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1199(02)00024-x

Google Scholar

[6] Fama, e. f. and m. Jensen. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of law and economics, 1983, (26): 301-325.

Google Scholar

[7] Jensen, Michael c. the modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of i. the journal of finance. Cambridge: jul 1993. vol. 48, iss. 3; p.831.

Google Scholar

[8] Hart, Corporate Governance:Some Theory and Implications, Economic Journal, 1995, pp.678-89.

Google Scholar

[9] Jensen and Meckling, the Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, pp.305-362.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x

Google Scholar

[10] Yermack. Higher valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 1996, 40: 185-212.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(95)00844-5

Google Scholar

[11] Edith T. Penrose, The Growth of the Firm-A Case Study:The Hercules Powder Company, The Business History Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1960, pp.1-23.

DOI: 10.2307/3111776

Google Scholar