Case Study on FMECA and Risk Assessment for the Door System in High Speed Train

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the FMEA and risk assessment analysis method, authors proposed 25 kinds of failure modes about the door system of high-speed train, conducted a risk assessment from the risk grade and criticality. Four kinds of failure modes are obtained with the highest level of risk and criticality in the door system of high-speed train. They are control failure, communication failure, compensator failure and poor function. Four key components, affecting the door system safety of high-speed train, are identified in terms of door control unit, driving device, locking mechanism and platform compensator. Research outcomes can be used in analyzing the failure causes and specific solutions to reduce and avoid the high-speed train operation risk.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 655-657)

Pages:

2335-2339

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] IEC 61508-2000. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems, (2000).

DOI: 10.3403/03263848u

Google Scholar

[2] EN50126: Railway Applications-the Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). Geneva: International Electro technical Commission, (2002).

DOI: 10.3403/bsen50126

Google Scholar

[3] D. H. Stamatis: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution, Second Edition (ASQ Quality Press 2003).

Google Scholar

[4] Ximing Dong: Railway Vehicle Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) (China Railway Publishing 2009) (In Chinese).

Google Scholar