Magnetizing Method for High Precision MFL Inspection of Longitudinal Defects of Thick Wall Steel Pipe

Article Preview

Abstract:

Circumferential magnetization of the thick wall steel pipe is carried out for the inspection of longitudinal defects in magnetic flux leakage testing. For high precision magnetic flux leakage testing, magnetic field distribution along the axial direction must be uniform, thus a new type of pole shoe structure is proposed in this paper to enlarge the uniformly magnetized area. Thick wall steel pipes are hard to be magnetized to near saturation, especially when the new pole shoe is used, which makes difficult for the magnetic sensors to pick up the magnetic leakage field. Therefore, the relationship between the magnetic flux density of the detection zone and the dimensions of the magnetizer has been studied by finite element simulation. These results are helpful in the design of circumferential magnetizer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 718-720)

Pages:

898-902

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Petroleum and natural gas industries – steel pipe for pipeline transportation systems, 'Specification for line pipe', ASN/API Specification 5L, No 44, 2008.

DOI: 10.3403/30235500u

Google Scholar

[2] F. Forster, 'New findings in the field of non-destructive magnetic flux leakage field inspection', NDT&E Int, Vol 19, No 1, pp.3-14, Feb 1986.

DOI: 10.1016/0308-9126(86)90134-3

Google Scholar

[3] J. Nestleroth and T. Bubenik, 'Magnetic flux leakage technology for natural gas pipeline inspection', Topical Report to Gas Research Institute, Tech Rep GRI-00/0180, Feb,1999.

Google Scholar

[4] Huang Zuoying, Que Peiwen, Chen Liang. 3D FEM analysis in magnetic flux leakage method. NDT&E International 39 (2006) 61-66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.06.006

Google Scholar

[5] U. Patel and D. Rodger. Calculation of magnetostatic field around far side defects for nondestructive testing. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 31, NO. 3, MAY 1995.

DOI: 10.1109/20.376477

Google Scholar

[6] Luming LI, Songling HUANG, Peng ZHENG and Keren SHI. Evaluation of surface cracks using magnetic flux leakage testing. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. , Vol.18 No.4, 2002.

Google Scholar

[7] F.I. Al-Naemi, J.P. Hall, A.J. Moses. FEM modeling techniques of magnetic flux leakage-type NDT for ferromagnetic plate inspections. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 304 (2006) e790-e793.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.02.225

Google Scholar

[8] M. Katoh, K. Nishio, T. Yamaguchi. FEM study on the influence of air gap and specimen thickness on the detectability of flaw in the yoke method.

DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8695(99)00060-2

Google Scholar

[9] Yanhua Sun, Yihua Kang, High-Speed Magnetic Flux Leakage Technique and Apparatus Based on Orthogonal Magnetization for Steel Pipe. Materials Evaluation, 68(4): 452-458, 2010.

Google Scholar