Sonication Parameters Analysis of MWCNTs Monodispersion in Aqueous Solution of Triton X-100

Article Preview

Abstract:

Monodispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with assistance of surfactants has become a usual procedure. A parametric analysis of sonication was performed in order to optimize the preparation procedure of MWCNTs monodispersion solution. MWCNTs solutions were characterized with results of UV-VIS absorbance and FT-IR spectra in order to find the optimal sonication time and power. Perfect sonication time obtained at the higher absorption peak 2.699 in 400nm is 42min, which can be define as sonication cycle. MWCNTs can achieve its optimum dispersion situation, when onication power is 270w, In this case, zeta potential can get as high as-45.2mv. Film achieved under combination of two kinds of optimization parameters is more smoothy and integrated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

46-51

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Adam J. Blanch, Claire E. Lenehan, Jamie S. Quinton. Parametric analysis of sonication and centrifugation variables for dispersion of single walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate. Carbon 2011(49): 5213-5228.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.039

Google Scholar

[2] Thess A. Lee R, Nikolaev P, Dai H, Petit P, Robert J, et al. Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science 1996; 273(5274): 483–7.

DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5274.483

Google Scholar

[3] Bergin SD, Sun Z, Streich P, Hamilton J, Coleman JN. New solvents for nanotubes: approaching the dispersibility of surfactants. J Phys Chem C 2010; 114(1): 231–7.

DOI: 10.1021/jp908923m

Google Scholar

[4] Hersam MC. Progress towards monodisperse single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol 2008; 3(7): 387–94.

Google Scholar

[5] Jiang LQ, Gao L, Sun J. Production of aqueous colloidal dispersions of carbon nanotubes. J Colloid Interface Sci 2003; 260: 89–94.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(02)00176-5

Google Scholar

[6] Guan LH, Shi ZJ, Gu ZN. Exfoliation of single-walled carbon nano- tube bundles under electron beam irradiation. Carbon 2005, 43: 1101– 1103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.11.045

Google Scholar

[7] Sabba Y, Thomas EL. High-concentration dispersion of single-wall carbon nano- tubes. Macromolecules 2004; 37: 4815–20.

DOI: 10.1021/ma049706u

Google Scholar

[8] Xiao KQ, Zhang LC. Effective separation and alignment of longentangled carbon nanotubes in epoxy. J Mater Sci 2005; 40: 6513–6.

Google Scholar

[9] Safadi B, Andrews R, Grulke EA. Multiwalled carbon nanotube polymer composites: synthesis and characterization of thin films. J Appl Polym Sci 2002; 84: 2660–9.

DOI: 10.1002/app.10436

Google Scholar

[10] Islam MF, Rojas E, Bergey DM, Johnson AT, Yodh AG. High weight fraction surfa-ctant solubilization of single-wall carbon nanotubes in water. Nano Lett 2003; 3: 269–73.

DOI: 10.1021/nl025924u

Google Scholar

[11] Decker JE, Walker ARH, Bosnick K, Clifford CA, Dai L, Fagan J, et al. Sample preparation protocols for realization of reproducible characterization of single- wall carbon nanotubes.

DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/46/6/011

Google Scholar

[12] Jiang LQ, Gao L, Sun J. Production of aqueous colloidal dispersions of carbon nanotubes. J Colloid Interface Sci 2003; 260: 89–94.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(02)00176-5

Google Scholar

[13] Grossiord N, Regev O, Loos J, Meuldijk J, Koning CE. Timedependent study of the exfoliation process of carbon nanotubes in aqueous dispersions by using UV– visible spectroscopy. Anal Chem 2005; 77: 5135–9.

DOI: 10.1021/ac050358j

Google Scholar

[14] Wang Y, Wu J, Wei F. A treatment method to give separated multi-walled carbon nanotubes with high purity, high crystallization and a large aspect ratio. Carbon 2003; 41: 2939–48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6223(03)00390-7

Google Scholar