Effect of Tube Size on Flow Pattern of Air-Water Two-Phase Flow in Horizontal Tubes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aiming at the diameter range of boiler water wall tubes in practical engineering application, the air-water two phase flow pattern in horizontal tube was experimentally investigated in tubes with different inner diameters of 20mm and 8 mm under atmosphere condition. The stratified flow, wave flow, plug flow, slug flow, annular flow, bubbly flow and mist flow were observed in the tubes. Most of the experimental points agree well with the Baker flow pattern map when they appear in the map. With the experimental results, the range lines between the flow patterns were suggested for the tube of 20mm in inner diameter as well as 8mm. As the water superficial velocity increases, the annular flow transforms into mist flow at a decreasing air superficial velocity. The two phase flow patterns transition line is similar in tendency for different tubes. The slug flow transforms into annular flow at an increasing air superficial velocity as tube diameter decreases. The stratified flow transforms into slug flow at an increasing water superficial velocity as tube diameter decreases. The transition line between plug flow and slug flow is independent of tube diameter.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

575-580

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. F. Hewitt: Measurement of two-phase flow para- meters (Academic Press, London 1980).

Google Scholar

[2] L. J. Zhou, R. C. Yang, B. Zhang, H. J. Qin: Journal of Engineering Thermophysics Vol. 21 (2000), p.358.

Google Scholar

[3] L. Y. Lao: Advances in Mechanics Vol. 32 (2002), p.235.

Google Scholar

[4] D. S. Liu, S. D. Wang: Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Vol. 47 (2008), p.243.

Google Scholar

[5] H. N. Niu, L. W. Pan, H. J. Su, S. D. Wang: Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Vol. 48 (2009), p.1621.

Google Scholar

[6] W. Cheng, C. Song, W. H. Liu, Y. Murai: Journal of Engineering Thermophysics Vol. 30 (2009), p.83.

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Z. Meng, Z. Y. Huang, B. L. Wang, H. F. Ji, H. Q. Li, Y. Yan: Flow Measurement and Instrumentation Vol. 21 (2010), p.268.

Google Scholar

[8] G. D. Xia, L. Chai: Journal of Hydrodynamics Vol. 24 (2012), p.39.

Google Scholar

[9] E. Pereyra, C. Torres, R. Mohan, L. Gomez, G. Kouba, O. Shoham: Chemical Engineering Research and Design Vol. 90 (2012), p.507.

Google Scholar

[10] O. Baker: The Oil and Gas Journal Vol. 53 (1954), p.185.

Google Scholar

[11] D. S. Scott: Advances in Chemical Engineering Vol. 4 (1964), p.199.

Google Scholar

[12] K. J. Bell, J. Taborek, F. Fenoglio: Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series Vol. 66 (1969), p.150.

Google Scholar

[13] H. H. Schicht: Verfahrenstechnik Vol. 3(1969), p.153.

Google Scholar

[14] J. N. Al-Sheikh, D. E. Saunders, R. S. Brodikey: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 48 (1970), p.21.

Google Scholar

[15] J. M. Mandhane, G. A. Gregory, K. Aziz: International Journal of Multiphase Flow Vol. 1(1974), p.537.

Google Scholar

[16] S. A. Fisher, S. K. W. Y u: International Journal of Multiphase Flow Vol. 1 (1975), p.771.

Google Scholar

[17] J. Weisman, D. Duncan, J. Gibson, T. Crawford: International Journal of Multiphase Flow Vol. 5(1979), p.437.

Google Scholar

[18] J. W. Coleman, S. Garimella: International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer Vol. 42(1999), p.2869.

Google Scholar

[19] M. Venkatesan, K. D. Sarit, A. R. Balakrishnan: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 88(2010), p.936.

Google Scholar