Fast Hydrolysis of Antler Residue by PEF Assisted Pepsin

Article Preview

Abstract:

Under optimized pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment for production of antlers calcium citrate malate and antlers collagen polypeptideby one-factor test were studied. The yield of dissoluble calcium (YDC) and protein degree of hydrolysis (DH) were used as characteristic indexes, the tests were carried out using different factors, which is as follows: the molar ratio of citric acid to malic acid (2:1-1:2), mixed acid content (0.1-1.0 mol/L), E/S (1-6 %), electric field intensity (5-30 kV/cm) and pulse number (2-12) were studied. The results indicated that the optimum conditions were E/S 4.0%, acid concentration 0.5 mol/L, electric field intensity 20 kV/cm, pulse number 8, the DH of 19.3±0.34 % and the YDC of 26±0.45 % were obtained.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 850-851)

Pages:

1125-1128

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. S. Hoon, N. Takuo, J. H. Robert, S.S. Jeong: Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 43 (1995) No. 11, p.2846.

Google Scholar

[2] S.W. Guan, L.X. Duan, Y.Y. Li, B.X. Wang: Acta Biochimica Polonicaacta Biochimica Polonica, Vol. 53 (2006) No. 2, p.395.

Google Scholar

[3] M.R. Woodbury, N.A. Caulkett, P.R. Wilson: American Journal of Veterinary Research, Vol. 43 (2002), p.869.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Zhou, S.F. L: submitted to Food Chemistry, Vol. 114 (2009), p.1321.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Alexander, H. Volke, K. Dietrich: Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Vol. 2 (2000) No. 1, p.135.

Google Scholar

[6] B.S. Gupta, F. Masterson, T. R. A. Magee: Food Research Technology, Vol. 217 (2003), p.434.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Puértolas, N. López, S. Condón, et al:International Journal of Food Microbiology, Vol. 130 (2009), p.49.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Giner, V. Gimeno, M. Palomes, et al: European Food Research and Technology, Vol. 217 (2003), p.43.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Giner, M. Ortega, M. Mesegué, V. Gimeno, G. V Barbosa-Cánovas: Journal of Food Science, Vol. 67 (2002) No. 4, p.1467.

Google Scholar

[10] Y.G. Yin, Y.R. Cui, H.W. Ding:Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Vol. 9 (2008), p.306.

Google Scholar

[11] Y.G. Yin, Y.Z. Han, Y. Han: International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Vol. 312 (2006), p.33.

Google Scholar

[12] Y.G. Yin, G.D. He: Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 61 (2008), p.148.

Google Scholar

[13] S.Y. Ho, G.S. Mittal, J.D. Cross: Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 31 (1997), p.69.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Reinwald, C. M. Weaver, J.J. Kester: Advance Food Nutrition Research, Vol. 54 (2008), p.219.

Google Scholar

[15] X. Guo, X. Zou, M. Sun: Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 80 (2010), p.344.

Google Scholar

[16] P.B. Sweetser, C.E. Bricker: Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 26 (1954) No. 1, p.195.

Google Scholar

[17] D. Spellman, E. McEvoy, G. O'Cuinn, R.J. FitzGerald: International Dairy Journal, Vol. 13 (2003), p.447.

Google Scholar

[18] W.Z. Zhao, Z.P. Yu, J.B. Liu, et al: Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. Vol. 91 (2011), p.2201.

Google Scholar