The Influence of Resin Molds Fabricated with Different Forming Angle by Stereolithography on the Transmission Performance of Photonic Crystals

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to study the influence of fabrication accuracy on the transmission performance of photonic cystals, the resin molds with inverse diamond structure with the same size were fabricated in different forming angle (30°,60°,90°) by stereolithography (SL). The alumina PCs with diamond structure were obtained combining the molds and gel-casting. The results showed that different forming angle of three kinds molds resulted in the change of the size and relative angle of their cells, and the PCs fabricated were also. The transmission properties of PCs had an obvious change in the width and smoothness of the band gap, which displayed that the resin molds by SL resulted in fabrication errors would affect the transmission properties of PCs. In the practical fabrication of diamond-structure PCs, fabrication errors caused in the different forming angle needed to be considered when SL technology was utilized to fabricate the molds, which also fit complex molds.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 875-877)

Pages:

1698-1701

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Yablonovitch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(1987), 2059–(2062).

Google Scholar

[2] S. John. Phys. Rev. Lett., 58(1987), 2486–2489.

Google Scholar

[3] T.S. Asano. B.S. Song and S. Noda. Optics Express. Vol. 14, Issue. 5(2006), p.1996-(2002).

Google Scholar

[4] E. Dulkeith. S.J. McNab. Y.A. Vlasov. Phys. Rev. B, Volume 72, Issue 11(2005).

Google Scholar

[5] J.B. Pendry. D. Schurig. D.R. Smith. Science. Vol. 312, No. 5781(2006), pp.1780-1782.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1125907

Google Scholar

[6] D.R. Smith. J.B. Pendry. M.C.K. Wiltshire. Science. Vol. 305, No. 5685(2004), pp.788-792.

Google Scholar

[7] J.M. Sharee, A.V. Yurii. Optics Letters, Vol. 31, Issue 6(2006), pp.745-747.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Yablonovitch. T. J. Gmitter. K. M. Leung. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67.

Google Scholar

[17] (1991), 2295–8.

Google Scholar

[9] E. Ozbay. A. Abeyta. G. Tuttle and M. Tringides. Phys. Rev. B. 50(1994), 1945–8.

Google Scholar

[10] C.J. Reilly. W.J. Chappell. J.W. Halloran. . J. Am. Ceram. Soc 87.

Google Scholar

[8] (2004), 1446–1453.

Google Scholar

[11] H.J. Liu. Y.M. Li. Y. Hao. Advances in Abrasive Technology VIII (2005), pp: 593-6.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Kirihara. Y. Miyamoto. K. Takenaga. Solid State Commun 121(2002), 435–9.

Google Scholar

[13] W.Z. Zhou. D.C. Li. Z.W. Chen. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. Volume 52(2010), Numbers 5-8.

Google Scholar

[14] N. Delhote. D. Baillargeat. S. Verdeyme and C. Delage. Journals Microwave Theory and Technique, Volume: 55, Issue: 3(2007).

Google Scholar

[15] N. Delhote. D. Baillargeat. S. Verdeyme and M. Thevenot. IEEE/MTT-S Internation (2007), pp: 1431-1434.

Google Scholar

[16] S.B. Chen. D.C. Li. X.Y. Tian. RP Journal, vol: 18, iss: 1(2011).

Google Scholar