Experimental Study on Reactivity of Limestone in FGD System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The limestone collected from the Ji county of Tianjin was investigated in this study. The characterization of the limestone dissolution in wet FGD system is carried out by sulfuric acid titration. The results indicate that A lower PH value is benefit for the limestone dissolution, which causes high dissolution rate within short time. Smaller particle size results in higher dissolution rate. The addition of inorganic salt and organic acid significantly affect the limestone dissolution. The limestone dissolution rate increases with the increase of organic acid concentration. In all the inorganic salt, it is obvious that Na+ has an positive effect while CI- plays a negative role on the limestone dissolution. However, the addition of composite additive of adipic acid plus MgO to the limestone slurry is greatly better than using the adipic acid or MgO only.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 875-877)

Pages:

1702-1706

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rochelle G T and Weems W. Buffer additives for limestone slurry scrubbing[A]. ACS symposium series[C] Washington D C: American Chemical Society, 1982, 188.

DOI: 10.1021/bk-1982-0188.ch012

Google Scholar

[2] Frandsen B W. Optimization of a wet FGD pilot plant using fine limestone and organic acids [J]. Chemical Engineering science, 2001, 56: 3275-3287.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(01)00010-0

Google Scholar

[3] Ahlbeck J, Engman T, Falten S and Vihma M. A method for measuring the reactivity of absorbents for wet flu desulfurization[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci, 1993, 48(20): 3479-3484.

DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(93)85003-8

Google Scholar

[4] Ahlbeck J, Engman T, Falten S and Vihma M. A method for measuring the reactivity of absorbents for wet flue desulfurization[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci, 1995, 50(7): 1081-1089.

DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(94)00482-7

Google Scholar

[5] Shih S M, Lin J P and Shiau G Y. Dissolution rates of limestone of different sources [J].J. Hazardous Materials B, 2000, 79(1): 159-171.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00253-3

Google Scholar

[6] Ukawa N, Takashina T, Oshima M. Effects of salts on limestone dissolution rate in wet limestone flue gas desulfurization [J]. Environment Progress, 1993, 12, (4): 294-299.

DOI: 10.1002/ep.670120410

Google Scholar

[7] Li Y P, Tan T E and Jing G H. Effects of salts on pH of SO2-H2O-CaC03 reaction system [J]. Environmental pollution and control, 1997, 19(5): 1-5.

Google Scholar

[8] Wu Z B, She S Q and Mo J S. Experimental study of desulfurization process with limestone slurry enhanced by hexanedioic acid [J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2003, 17(5): 540-544.

Google Scholar

[9] Mobley J D and Cassidy M. Organic acids can enhance wet limestone flue gas scrubbing[J]. Power Engineering, 1986, 24(6): 32-35.

Google Scholar

[10] Mobley J D and Chang C S. The adipic acid enhance limestone flue gas desulfurization process: An assessment[J]. Journal of the air Pollution Control Association, 1981, 31(12): 1249-1253.

DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1981.10465353

Google Scholar

[11] Hu J B, Hu L L, Duan Z Y and Chen Z Q. Progress of additives for wet FGD process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2005, 22(6): 456-460.

Google Scholar