Co-Pyrolysis Characteristics and Product Distributions of Coal Tailings and Biomass Blends

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to make better utilization of coal tailings (low quality production after coal preparation) as the resources, the pyrolysis characteristics and product distributions during co-pyrolysis of coal tailings together with biomass at different ratio (20%, 40%, 60% and 80%) were determined in thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and a fixed bed reactor in this paper. Coal tailings (TC) selected was provided by Hexi coal in Shanxi province, and pine branch wastes (PBW) were used as biomass samples. The result of TGA experiments indicates that the temperature corresponding to the maximum pyrolysis rate exhibited a significant difference between TC and PBW, and the value of the calculated TGA and DTG curves is similar to the experimental ones. In a fixed bed experiments within a temperature range of 25-900°C, gas product yields of co-pyrolysis of TC and PBW are higher than those of the sum of them individually, while tar and char yields were on the contrary. It shows some synergetic effect exists during co-pyrolysis process of TC and PBW blends, and the maximum synergy exhibits with a PBW blending ratio of 40%. CO yield increases up to 30% at 400°C and CH4 yield increases up to 11.33% at 700°C compared with the calculated value. These findings can potentially help to understand and predict the behavior of coal tailings/biomass blends in practical systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

177-184

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Ryu, K. Finney, V. N. Sharifi, J. Swithenbank, Palletized fuel production from coal tailings and spent mushroom compost – Part I Identification of pelletisation parameters. Fuel Process. Technol. 89 (2008) 269–275.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.11.035

Google Scholar

[2] C.N. Hamelinck, A.P.C. Faaij, H.D. Uil, et al, Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential, Energy. 29 (2004) 1743–1771.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.01.002

Google Scholar

[3] M. Sami, K. Annamalai, M. Wooldridge, Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends, Prog. Energy Combust Sci. 27 (2001) 171–214.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1285(00)00020-4

Google Scholar

[4] D.K. Park, S.D. Kim, S.H. Le, et al, Co-pyrolysis characteristics of sawdust and coal blend in TGA and a fixed bed reactor, Bioresour. Technol. 101 (2010) 6151–6156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.087

Google Scholar

[5] E. Kastanaki, D. Vamvuka, P. Grammelis, et al, Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of lignite–biomass blends during devolatilization, Fuel Process. Technol. 77–78 (2002) 159–166.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(02)00049-8

Google Scholar

[6] C. Meesri, B. Moghtaderi, Lack of synergistic effects in the pyrolytic characteristics of woody biomass/coal blends under low and high heating rate regimes, Biomass Bioenergy. 23 (2002) 55–66.

DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00034-x

Google Scholar

[7] W.H. Chen, J.S. Wu, An evaluation on rice husks and pulverized coal blends using a drop tube furnace and a thermogravimetric analyzer for application to a blast furnace, Energy. 34 (2009) 1458–1466.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.033

Google Scholar

[8] B. Moghtaderi, C. Meesri, T.F. Wall, Pyrolytic characteristics of blended coal andwoody biomass, Fuel. 83 (2004) 745–50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2003.05.003

Google Scholar

[9] H. Haykiri-Acma, S. Yaman, Interaction between biomass and different rank coals during co-pyrolysis, Renewable Energy. 35 (2010) 288–292.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.001

Google Scholar

[10] K.M. Lu, W.J. Lee, W.H. Chen, et al, Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied wood and coal blends, Appl. Energy. 105 (2013) 57–65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.050

Google Scholar

[11] H.B. Vuthaluru, Investigations into the pyrolytic behaviour of coal/biomass blends using thermogravimetric analysis, Bioresource Technol. 92 (2004) 187–195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.08.008

Google Scholar

[12] B. Moghtaderi, C. Meesri, T.F. Wall. Pyrolytic characteristics of blended coal and woody biomass, J. Fuel. 83 (2004) 745–750.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2003.05.003

Google Scholar

[13] H. Haykiri-Acma, S. Yaman. Interaction between biomass and different rank coals during co-pyrolysis, Renewable Energy. 35 (2010) 288–292.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.001

Google Scholar

[14] E. Kastanaki, D. Vamvuka, P. Grammelis, et al, Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of lignite-biomass blends during devolatilization, Fuel Process Technol. 77–78 (2002) 159–166.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(02)00049-8

Google Scholar

[15] T. Sonobe, N. Worasuwannarak, S. Pipatmanomai, Synergies in co-pyrolysis of Thai lignite and corncob, Fuel Process Technol. 89 (2008) 1371–1378.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.06.006

Google Scholar

[16] T.W. Nathan, C.M. Nichola, D.M. Bryan, Product distributions from isothermal co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass, Fuel. 94 (2012) 563–570.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.046

Google Scholar

[17] S.V. Vassilev, D. baxter, L.K. Andersen, et al, An overview of the chemical composition of biomass, Fuel. 89 (2010) 913–933.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022

Google Scholar

[18] R. Xu, L. Ferrante, C. Briens, et al, Flash pyrolysis of grape residues intobiofuel in a bubbling fluid bed, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 86 (2009) 58–65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2009.04.005

Google Scholar

[19] H. Zhang, R. Xiao, H. Huang, et al, Comparison of non-catalytic and catalytic fast pyrolysis of corncob in a fluidized bed reactor, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009) 1428–1434.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.031

Google Scholar

[20] J. Yanik, C. Kornmayer, M. Saglam, et al, Fast pyrolysis of agricultural wastes: Characterization of pyrolysis products, Fuel Process Technol. 88 (2007) 942–947.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.05.002

Google Scholar

[21] T. Hosoya, H. Kawamoto, S. Saka, Pyrolysis gasification reactivities of primary tar and char fractions from cellulose and lignin as studied with a closed ampoule reactor, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 83 (2008) 71–77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2008.06.002

Google Scholar

[22] N. Worasuwannarak, T. Sonobe, W. Tanthapanichakoon, Pyrolysis behaviours of rice straw, rice husk, and corncob by TG–MS technique, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 78 (2007) 265–271.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2006.08.002

Google Scholar

[23] R.K. Harma, J.B. Wooten, V.L. Baliga, et al, Fuel. 83 (2004) 1469–1482.

Google Scholar

[24] I. Suelves, M.J. Lázaro, R. Moliner, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 65 (2002) 197–206.

Google Scholar

[25] C.A. Ulloa, A.L. Gordon, X.A. Garcia, Thermogravimetric study of interactions in the pyrolysis of blends of coal with radiate pine sawdust, Fuel Process Technol. 90 (2009) 583-590.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.12.015

Google Scholar