Performances of Leaching-UBF Anaerobic Digestion for Biogas Production of Kitchen Waste

Article Preview

Abstract:

The performances of leaching-upflow blanket filter (UBF) anaerobic digestion for biogas production of kitchen waste was investigated. To find out the process parameter variations of acidification phase and the methane production performance of methanogenic phase, kitchen waste from division of environment sanitation management of Changzhou was used as feedstock. The results show that the ammonia in anaerobic system cumulated continuously throughout the digestion; pH value maintained at7.6; At first the value of COD ranged from 20000 mg/L to 140000 mg/L to the final UBF water 10000mg/L to 12000 mg/L; Volatile fatty acid (VFA) reduced to 150mg/L with the increase of the days; total nitrogen increases first and then decreases, finally, it keeps at 1600 mg/L; The concentration of alkalinity increased slightly; biogas production is stable, The rate of gas generation is above0.30 m3/kgCOD . These results provide a proof of the feasibility for kitchen waste anaerobic methane fermentation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

489-495

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.Q. Yang , D. Sh. Shen , N. Li, et al. Co-digestion of kitchen waste and fruit–vegetable wasteby two-phase anaerobic digestion. Environ Sci. Pollut Res (2013) 20: 2162–2171.

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1414-y

Google Scholar

[2] X. w. Wu, K. Wei, S. Sha, et al. Present status and developing trend of kitchen garbage processing in China and abroad. Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering, 2012, (12): 49-52.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. S. Yun, J. I. Park, M. S. Sun, et al. Treatment of food wastes using slurry-phase decomposition. Bioresource technology. 2000, 73 (1): 21-27.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00131-5

Google Scholar

[4] X. Wang, D.H. Wang, J. F LI., et al. Status quo of kitchen waste aqnaerobic digestion. China Biogas, 2006, 24 (002): 35-39.

Google Scholar

[5] X.H. Wang, G.W. Li, H. Meng, et al. Discussion on treatment status of food residue. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2005, 13 (2): 41-43.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Zhang, H.Z. Shi, L.L. Zhang , et al. The influence of pH on hydrolysis and acidogenesis of kitchen wastes in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Scientiae Circumstantiae. 2005, 25 (5): 665-669.

DOI: 10.1080/09593332608618563

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Zhu, D.Y. Wang, A.J. Gong, et al. Overview of food residue treatment methods. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2011, 19 (3): 50-52.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. L Zhong, X.J. Li, B. Li, et al. Performances of two-phase SBMR-ASBR anaerobic digestion for biogas production of kitchen waste. Renewable Energy Resources, 2012, 30 (10): 47-51.

Google Scholar

[9] J.K. CHO, S. C. PARK. Biochemical methane potential and solid slate anaerobic digestion of Korea food wastes. Bioresour Technol, 1995, 52 (3): 245-253.

DOI: 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00031-9

Google Scholar

[10] J.Y. Wang, H.L. Xu, J.H. Tang. A hybrid two-phase system for anaerobic digestion of food waste. Water Sci. Technol, 2002, 45 (12): 159-165.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0422

Google Scholar

[11] Mohammed Mohaibes, Helvi Heinonen-Tanski. Aerobic thermophilic treatment of farm slurry and food wastes. Bioresource Technology 95 (2004): 245-254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.022

Google Scholar

[12] L. Shao, G.C. Zhu. Review on influence and optimization of anaerobic digestion of food waste. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 21(6): 56-59.

Google Scholar

[13] B. Zhang, H.Z. Shi, L. L Zhang., et al. The influence of pH on hydrolysis and acidogenesis of kitchen wastes in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2005, 25(5): 665-669.

DOI: 10.1080/09593332608618563

Google Scholar

[14] J.H. Zhao, B Zhang., W.M. Cai. Influence of temperature on hydrolysis and acidogenesis of kitchen wastes in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Environmental Science, 2006, 27 (8): 1682-1686.

Google Scholar

[15] Christ O, Wilderer P A, Angerhofer R, et al. Mathematical modeling of the hydrolysis of anaerobic processes. Water Science Technology, 2000, 41(3): 61-65.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2000.0056

Google Scholar

[16] Lim S J, Kim B J, Jeong C M, et al. Anaerobic organic acid production of food waste in once-a-day feeding and drawing-off bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99 (16): 7866-7874.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.028

Google Scholar

[17] Y. Park, F. Hong, J. Cheon, et al. Comparison of thermophilic anaerobic digestion characteristics between single-phase and two-phase systems for kitchen garbage treatment. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2008, 105(1): 48-54.

DOI: 10.1263/jbb.105.48

Google Scholar

[18] Carnerio T. F. ,Perez M., Romero L I. Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste[. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(15): 6994-7002.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.018

Google Scholar

[19] P.J. He, X.J. Pan, F. Lv, et al. The influence of pH value on anaerobic hydrolysis and acidogenesis rates of biodegradable organic waste . China Environmental Science, 2006, 26 (1): 57-61.

Google Scholar

[20] R. H Zhang., M. Hamed, K. Hartman, et al. Characterizationof food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion . Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(4): 929-935.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.039

Google Scholar

[21] S. T Fu., S. L Yu., X. J Yan., et al. Co-digestion of waste activated sludge and kitchen garbage. Environment Science, 2006, 27: 1459-1463.

Google Scholar

[22] L. Ma, D.H. Wang, Z C.M. eng. Dry anaerobic digestion process for treating food waste. China Biogas, 2007, 25(1): 27-30.

Google Scholar