Mesophilic Anaerobic Study on Chinese Herbs Residues of Honeysuckle and Midday Tea

Article Preview

Abstract:

A large number of Chinese herbs residues were produced during the production of honeysuckle and midday tea. Usually, the content of organic components in the residues was at a high level. These residues would pose a great threat to the local water environment, if they were not treated and disposed properly. In this paper, a self-prepared anaerobic reactor was utilized to treat the residues of honeysuckle and midday tea in semi-solid phase media. The anaerobic sludge was inoculated into the residues for anaerobic digestion at the temperature of 37±1°C, and ISRs (ISRs is the total solid mass ratio between inoculum and substrate) were 1:2, 1:1, 2:1 respectively. The result showed that the ultimate maximum yield of methane was the under ISRs of 1:1, the cumulative methane production volume of honeysuckle and midday tea dregs were 5832mL/100g and 5591mL/100g, respectively, after 192h digestion. Under the best inoculation ratio of 1:1, another mesophilic anaerobic experiment was carried out by mixing the residues of honeysuckle and midday tea as substrate at different ratios of 0:3, 1:2, 1:1, 2:1 and 3:0, respectively, which were to compare the methane production at 37±1°C. The result indicated that the ultimate maximum yield of methane was under mixed ratio of 1:2, the cumulative methane production volume of the mixed Chinese herbs residues was 9110 mL/100g after 192h digestion. Furthermore, the zero-order kinetic model was found to be suitable to characterize the removal ratio of substrate during 0~108h digestion while the biogas was generated fast, and the kinetic constant k was 50.49mL/h. To obtain the ultimate maximum rate of methane production, the anaerobic reaction should be controlled under the stage of zero-order reaction. Thus, the experimental results could provide scientific proof for anaerobic treatment and methane recycling in organic waste of Chinese herbs enterprises.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

481-488

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Yang, L.H. Xia, Z. H Zhang, et al, Present situation and development trend of ecoutilization of residues production in plant extraction, Modern Chemical Industry. 28 (2008) 14-15.

Google Scholar

[2] X. Chen, R.T. Romano, R. Zhang, Anaerobic digestion of food wastes for biogas production, Int J Agr Bio Eng. 3 (2010) 61-72.

Google Scholar

[3] D.P. Chynoweth, J.M. Owens, R. Legrand, Renewable methane from anaerobic digestion of biomass, Renew Energy. 22 (2000) 22: 1-8.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-1481(00)00019-7

Google Scholar

[4] L.C. Shi, C. Ye, X. Li, Method and comprehensive utilization of dregs produced by traditional Chinese medicine production enterprises, Guide of China Medicine. 5 (2012) 14-16.

Google Scholar

[5] Z.K. Zhao, S.L. Wang, L.T. Ding, T. Xie, et al, Research Development of Chinese Herb Residues Reusing, Journal of Hangzhou Normal Univerity. 1 (2012) 38-42.

Google Scholar

[6] I.M. ALATIQI, M.F. HAMODA, A.A. DADKHAH, Kinetic Analysis of Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Sludge, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 107 (1998) 393-407.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1005042408948

Google Scholar

[7] S.V. KALYUZHNYY, V.P. GACHOK, V.I. SKLYAR, et al, Kinetic Investigation and Mathematical Modeling of Methanogenesis of Glucose, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 28 (1991) 183-195.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02922599

Google Scholar

[8] X. Cheng, L. Xuqing, X. Jiaxin, et al, Anaerobic methane-production and subsliluting coal burning boiler of bottom pot water and bottom cellar water in the small and sauce sweet model liquor enterprises, Environmental Science & Technology. 34 (2011).

Google Scholar

[9] The editorial board of SEPA for the Monitoring And Analysis Method of water and waste water, Monitoring And Analysis Method of water and waste water, fourth ed., China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, 2002 104-106.

Google Scholar

[10] Johan Lindmark, Niklas Leksell, Anna Schnürer, Eva Thorin, Effects of mechanical pretreatment on the biogas yield from ley crop silage, Applied Energy. 97(2012) 498-502.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.066

Google Scholar

[11] Brunia E, Jensen AP, Angelidaki I, Comparative study of mechanical, hydrothermal, chemical and enzymatic treatments of digested biofibers to improve biogas production, Bioresource Technol. 101 (2010) 8713-8717.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.108

Google Scholar

[12] X.J. Wang, B. Wang, H. Feng, et al, Research Advancement of Bioethanol Preparation from Lignocellulosic Biomass, Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas. 11 (2007) 452-461.

Google Scholar

[13] Kouichi I, Okishio YK, Nagao N, Niwa C, Yamamoto S, Toda T, Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of food waste, Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 64 (2010) 601-608.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.06.013

Google Scholar

[14] Mshandete A, Bjornsson L, Kivaisi AK, Rubindamayugi MST, Mattiasson B, Effect of particle size on biogas yield from sisal fiber waste, Renew Energy. 31 (2006) 2385-2392.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.10.015

Google Scholar

[15] Parawira W, Murto M, Read JS, Mattiasson B, Volatile fatty acid production during anaerobic mesophilic digestion of solid potato waste, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 79 (2004) 673-677.

DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1012

Google Scholar

[16] Elefsiniotis P, Oldham WK, Influence of pH on the acid-phase anaerobic digestion of primary sludge, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 44 (1994) 7-13.

DOI: 10.1002/jctb.280600114

Google Scholar

[17] Hu Z-H, Wang G, Yu H-Q, Anaerobic degradation of cellulose by rumen microorganism at various pH, Biochemical Engineering Journal. 21 (2004) 59-62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2004.05.004

Google Scholar

[18] Q. Y Lin, Anaerobic Biotreatability and Methanogenic Toxicity Assays of CTMP Wastewater, China Pulp & Paper. 6 (1995) 6-11.

Google Scholar

[19] Hashimoto AG, Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and production rate, Biological Wastes. 28 (1989) 247-255.

DOI: 10.1016/0269-7483(89)90108-0

Google Scholar

[20] Gunaseelan VN, Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio and pretreatments on methane yield from Parthenium, Biomass and Bioenergy. 8 (1995) 39-44.

DOI: 10.1016/0961-9534(94)00086-9

Google Scholar

[21] Venko Beschkov, Tsvetan Sapundzhiev, Ivan Angelov, Modelling of biogas production from glycerol by anaerobic process in a baffled multi-stage digestor, Biotechnol & Biotechnol Eq. 26 (2012) 3244-3248.

DOI: 10.5504/bbeq.2012.0061

Google Scholar