Overloading Behavior of Anthracyclines on Silica Column with Aqueous-Organic Mobile Phases: Effect of Organic Modifier

Article Preview

Abstract:

The peak shapes of 4 anthracyclines have been investigated using isoeluotropic mixtures of acetonitrile, methanol and tetrahydrofuran (THF) in combination with formate buffer at pH 2.9 on a silica column. With aqueous or aqueous-rich mobile phases, no significant differences in overloading behavior have been found with various organic modifiers. With organic-rich mobile phases, peak shape and its dependence on sample size are notably different when organic modifier concentration is changed. Pure aqueous buffer produces the overloaded peak profiles of the solutes associated with a typical Langmuir isotherm, while distinct anti-Langmuirian peaks have been achieved with organic-rich eluents. The general similarity of the loading behavior for the solutes with acetonitrile, THF or isopropanol has been reflected either in aqueous-rich or organic-rich eluents, suggesting that the nature of organic modifier dont dominate the peak shape but water content in the mobile phases.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 881-883)

Pages:

223-227

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.M.C. Buckenmaier, D.V. McCalley and M.R. Euerby: Anal. Chem. Vol. 74 (2002), p.4672.

Google Scholar

[2] D.V. McCalley: Anal. Chem. Vol. 75 (2003), p.3072.

Google Scholar

[3] B.A. Olsen: J. Chromatogr. A Vol. 913 (2001), p.113.

Google Scholar

[4] I. Jane: J. Chromatogr. Vol. 111 (1975), p.227.

Google Scholar

[5] G.B. Cox and R.W. Stout: J. Chromatogr. Vol. 384 (1987), p.315.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Law: Trends Anal. Chem. Vol. 9 (1990), p.31.

Google Scholar

[7] L.L. Dong and J.X. Huang: Chromatographia Vol. 64 (2006), p.583.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Nawrocki: J. Chromatogr. A Vol. 779 (1997): p.29.

Google Scholar

[9] B.J. José, A.M. Aresa, J. Pól and S.K. Wiedmerc: J. Chromatogr. A Vol. 1218 (2011), p.7438.

Google Scholar

[10] A.L. N van Nuijs, I. Tarcomnicu and A. Covaci: J. Chromatogr. A Vol. 1218 (2011), p.5964.

Google Scholar

[11] R.P. Li, Y.L. Guo and Q. Yuan: J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rel. Technol. Vol. 34 (2011), p.1112.

Google Scholar

[12] W.Y. Jian, R.W. Edom, Y.D. Xu and N.D. Weng: J. Sep. Sci. Vol. 33 (2010), p.681.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Kahsay, H. Song, A.V. Schepdael, D. Cabooter and E. Adam: J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2013), http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jpba. 2013. 04. 015.

Google Scholar

[14] F. Arcamone: Doxorubicin (Academic Press, New York 1981).

Google Scholar

[15] R.P. Li and J.X. Huang: J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rel. Technol. Vol. 28 (2005), p.2737.

Google Scholar

[16] G. Guiochon, S.G. Shirazi and A.M. Katti: Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography (Academic Press, Boston 1994).

Google Scholar

[17] R.P. Li and J.X. Huang: J. Chromatogr. A Vol. 104 (2004), p.167.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Espinosa, E. Bosch and M. Rosés: Anal. Chem. Vol. 74 (2002), p.3809.

Google Scholar

[19] J.J. Kirkland: J. Chromatogr. Vol. 83 (1973), p.149.

Google Scholar

[20] J. Punčochářová, J. Kříž, L. Vodička and D. Průšová: J. Chromatogr. Vol. 191 (1980), p.81.

Google Scholar