Influence of Three Pattern Materials on the Marginal Adaption of Co-Cr Alloy Inner Crown of PFM Endocrown

Article Preview

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the influence of three pattern materials on the marginal fitness of Co-Cr alloy inner crown of porcelain fused to metal (PFM) endocrown. Method: Standard molar abutments mould with 90°shoulder, 6°convergens, 5.0mm occlusal-gingival height, and 15.0mm neck diameter were made of stainless steel. Three kinds of pattern materials, including Inlay wax (group A), Casting Pattern resin (group B), and Pattern Resin (group C), were used to fabricate the pattern of Co-Cr alloy inner crown of PFM endocrown. The fitness of the inner crown finished was evaluated. T test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The means of marginal gaps between inner crown and abutment shoulder made of three pattern materials were 55.9μm for group A, 37.1μm for group B, 63.1μm for group C respectively. There were statistically significance among the 3 groups (P< 0. 05). Conclusion: As a pattern material, Casting Pattern resin is suitable for fabrication of Co-Cr alloy inner crown of porcelain fused to metal endocrown.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 887-888)

Pages:

407-410

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang CY, Pai CA, Huang SF. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramicendocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Eur J Oral Sci. 118(2010)87-93.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00704.x

Google Scholar

[2] Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The Endocrown: An Alternative Approach for Restoring Extensively Damaged Molars. J Esthet Restor Dent. 21(2013)doi: 10. 1111/ jerd. 12065. [Epub ahead of print].

DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12065

Google Scholar

[3] Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 52(1984)28–35.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90176-8

Google Scholar

[4] Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 37(2012)130-6.

DOI: 10.2341/11-105-l

Google Scholar

[5] Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 75(1996)375–80.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90028-1

Google Scholar

[6] Chaio C, Kuo J, Lin Y, and Chang Y . Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns Journal of Dental Sciences. 4(2009) 110-117.

DOI: 10.1016/s1991-7902(09)60016-7

Google Scholar

[7] Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang CY, Pai CA, Huang SF. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Eur J Oral Sci 118(2010) 87–93.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00704.x

Google Scholar

[8] Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years—Preliminary results. J Adhes Dent 1(1999)255–265.

Google Scholar

[9] Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 7(1995)83–94.

Google Scholar

[10] Farshad Bajoghli, Saeid Nosouhian, Hamid Badrian, Hossein Goroohi, Amir Saberian, Leyla Gadesi. Effect of base metal alloys recasting on marginal intergrity of castable crowns. J Contemp Dent Practice. 14(2013)255-258.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1309

Google Scholar

[1] Craig RG, Restorative dental materials [M]. 9th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby, (1993).

Google Scholar

[12] Lander E, Dietschi D. Endocrowns: a clinical report. Quintessence Int. 39(2008)99-106.

Google Scholar

[13] Lin CL, Chang YH, Pai CA. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation. Dent Mater. 27(2011): 431-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.026

Google Scholar

[14] Cubas GB, Habekost L, Camacho GB, Pereira-Cenci T. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramicrestorations and luted with two different agents. J Prosthodont Res. 55(2011): 53-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001

Google Scholar

[15] Kitayama S, Nasser NA, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Watson TF, Foxton RM. Effect of resin coating and occlusal loading on microleakage of Class II computer-aided design/ computer -aided manufacturing fabricated ceramic restorations: a confocal microscopic study. Acta Odontol Scand. 69(2011).

DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2010.549504

Google Scholar