Analysis of Surface and Subsurface Layers after Shot Peening of Various Aluminium Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the paper two aluminium alloys, i.e. 6082 and 7075, which were cold hardened by shot peening under different conditions, are treated. Surface hardening was carried out with S170 steel shot of the same diameter, particle hardness being 56 HRC. Other conditions were the operating pressure, mass flow, which provide different Almen intensities. The hardened layer was described by surface integrity. Macroscopic and microscopic analyses consisted in analyses of hardened profiles of hardness, and residual stresses in the thin surface layer. Research results indicated that there were significant differences among the characteristics chosen to describe surface integrity and that they had an important influence on the final condition of the surface layer. With too severe settings of the peening parameters, the surface properties got worse because of damages, which resulted in crack initiation and growth of the existing cracks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 89-91)

Pages:

53-58

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Shulze: Modern Mechanical Surface Treatment: States, Stability, Effects, WILEYVCH Verlag Gmbh & Co. KGaA, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Grum, U. Trdan, M.R. Hill: Laser Shock Processing of ENAW 6082 aluminium alloy surface, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 589, 2008, 379-384.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.589.379

Google Scholar

[3] R. Clausen, J. Stangenberg: Roughness of shot-peened surfaces-definition and measurement, Proceedings of the 7th Int. Conference on Shot peening, 1999, 69-77.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Herzog, W. Zinn, B. Scholtes, H. Wohlfahrt: The Significance of Almen Intensity for the Generation of Shot Peening Residual Stresses, The Sixth Int. Conf. on Shot Peening, San Francisco 1996, USA, Ed.: J. Champaigne, 270-281.

DOI: 10.1002/3527606580.ch21

Google Scholar

[5] O. Higounenc: Correlation of shot peening parameters to surface characteristic, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Shot peening, 2005, 28-35.

Google Scholar

[6] C.A. Rodopoulos, S.A. Curtis, E.R. de los Rios, J. SolisRomero: Optimisation of the fatigue resistance of 2024-T351 aluminium alloys by controlled shot peeningmethodology, results and analysis, Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 26, 2004, 849-856.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.01.003

Google Scholar

[7] Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole Drilling Strain Gage method, ASTM E 837-01, 1995, 694-703.

DOI: 10.1520/e0837-01

Google Scholar

[8] J. Grum: Surface Integrity after Shot Peening Applied to a Precipitation-Hardened Aluminium Alloy, Metal Finishing News, Vol. 9, 2008, 54-56.

Google Scholar