Performance Evaluation of Liquid Nitrogen as Coolant in Turning of Al/SiC Metal Matrix Composites (AMMC)

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation on the turning of Al/SiC (LM-13) composite using Cryogenic Liquid Nitrogen (LN2) as coolant. The influence of machining performance parameters such as cutting force, cutting temperature and surface finish were investigated under wet and cryogenic machining. The results proved that the application of cryogenic LN2 coolant reduced the cutting temperature and the cutting force for about 19 to 30% and 24 to 35% respectively. The surface finish of the machined part is about 10 to 23% better than in the conventional coolant. Thus it was proved that the application of cryogenic coolants reduced the cutting force and temperature which resulted in an appreciable improvement in surface finish in machining of Al/SiC MMC.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

341-345

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Tomac and K. Tonnessen, Machinability of particulate aluminium matrix composites, Ann. CIRP. 41 (1) (1992), 55–58.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61151-2

Google Scholar

[2] J.E. Allison, G.S. Cole, Metal matrix composite in the automotive industry, opportunities and challenges, JOM (1993) 19–24.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03223361

Google Scholar

[3] L. Cronjager, D. Meister, Machining of fibre and particle-reinforced aluminium, Ann. CIRP 41 (1) (1992) 63–66.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61153-6

Google Scholar

[4] L.A. Loony, J.M. Monaghan, P. O'Reilly, D.R.P. Toplin, The turning of an Al/SiC metal matrix composite, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 33 (4) (1992) 453–468.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Weinert, W. Konig, A consideration of tool wear mechanism metal matrix composite (MMC), Ann. CIRP 42 (1) (1993) 95–98.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62400-7

Google Scholar

[6] A. Manna B. Bhattacharyya, A study on machinability of Al/SiC-MMC, J Mater Process Tech. 140 (2003) 711-716.

Google Scholar

[7] D.K. Dwivedi, A. Sharma and T.V. Rajan, Machining of LM13 and LM28 cast aluminium alloys: Part I, J Mater Process Tech. 196 (2008) 197-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.032

Google Scholar

[8] S. Kannan and H.A. Kishawy, Tribological aspects of machining aluminum metal matrix composites, J Mater Process Tech. 198 (2008) 399-406.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.021

Google Scholar

[9] Dhar NR, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB. Machining of AISI 4140 steel under cryogenic cooling – tool wear, surface roughness and dimensional deviation. J Mater Process Technol 2002; 123: 483–9.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00134-6

Google Scholar

[10] Paul S, Dhar NR, Chattopadhyay AB. Beneficial effects of cryogenic cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel. J Mater Process Tech. 116 (2001) 44–48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00839-1

Google Scholar

[11] Hong SY, Markus I, Jeong W. New cooling approach and tool life improvement in cryogenic machining of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf . 41 (2001) 2245–2260.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00041-4

Google Scholar

[12] M. Dhananchezian,M. Pradeep Kumar Cryogenic turning of the Ti–6Al–4V alloy with modified cutting tool inserts. Cryogenics 2011; 51: 34–40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.10.011

Google Scholar

[13] B. Dilip Jerold and M. Pradeep Kumar: Experimental comparison of carbon-dioxide and liquid nitrogen cryogenic coolants in turning of AlSI 1045 steel' in , Cryogenics 52 (2012) 569–574.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2012.07.009

Google Scholar

[14] Çakir O, Kiyak M, Altan E. Comparison of gases applications to wet and dry cuttings in turning. J Mater Process Tech. 2004; 153–154: 35–41.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.190

Google Scholar

[15] Liu J, Han R, Sun Y. Research on experiments and action mechanism with water vapor as coolant and lubricant in Green cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 45 (2005) 687–694.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.022

Google Scholar